mirror of
https://github.com/fleetdm/fleet
synced 2026-05-04 13:59:01 +00:00
49 lines
No EOL
1.3 KiB
Markdown
49 lines
No EOL
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# ADR-NNNN: Title
|
|
|
|
## Status
|
|
|
|
Proposed | Accepted | Rejected | Deprecated | Superseded
|
|
|
|
If superseded, include a link to the new ADR:
|
|
[ADR-NNNN: New ADR Title](NNNN-new-adr-title.md)
|
|
|
|
## Date
|
|
|
|
YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Describe the context and problem statement. What is the issue that we're seeing that is motivating this decision or change?
|
|
|
|
Include any constraints that influenced the decision (technical, business, or otherwise).
|
|
|
|
## Decision
|
|
|
|
Describe the decision that was made. State the decision in full sentences, with active voice.
|
|
|
|
Explain the solution chosen and why it was selected over alternatives.
|
|
|
|
## Consequences
|
|
|
|
Describe the consequences of the decision, both positive and negative. This should include:
|
|
|
|
- Benefits of implementing this decision
|
|
- Drawbacks or technical debt incurred
|
|
- Impact on existing systems or processes
|
|
- Future considerations or follow-up decisions needed
|
|
|
|
## Alternatives considered
|
|
|
|
Describe alternative solutions that were considered and why they were not chosen.
|
|
|
|
For each alternative:
|
|
- Describe the alternative approach
|
|
- List pros and cons
|
|
- Explain why it was not selected
|
|
|
|
## References
|
|
|
|
List any references, such as:
|
|
- Links to related issues or discussions
|
|
- External articles or documentation
|
|
- Research or data that influenced the decision |