87d7710175
* docs: fix spelling mistakes in many docs files Signed-off-by: Jesse Antoszyk <22500761+jcantosz@users.noreply.github.com> * Update other instance of ksane -> kasane Signed-off-by: Jesse Antoszyk <22500761+jcantosz@users.noreply.github.com> * ran make codegen
3.6 KiB
| title | authors | sponsors | reviewers | approvers | creation-date | last-updated | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neat-enhancement-idea |
|
|
|
|
yyyy-mm-dd | yyyy-mm-dd |
Neat Enhancement Idea
This is the title of the enhancement. Keep it simple and descriptive. A good title can help communicate what the enhancement is and should be considered as part of any review.
Open Questions [optional]
This is where to call out areas of the design that require closure before deciding to implement the design.
Summary
The Summary is required for producing accurate user-focused documentation
such as release notes or a development roadmap. It should be possible to collect this information
before implementation begins in order to avoid requiring implementors to split their attention
between writing release notes and implementing the feature itself. Before you get started with this document,
please feel free to have a conversation on this with the maintainers/community on Github that would help
drive a more organized thought process for the formal proposal here.
Motivation
This section is for explicitly listing the motivation, goals and non-goals of this proposal. Describe why the change is important and the benefits to users.
Goals
List the specific goals of the proposal and their measurable results. How will we know that this has succeeded?
Non-Goals
What is out of scope for this proposal? Listing non-goals helps to focus discussion and make progress.
Proposal
This is where we get down to details of what the proposal is about.
Use cases
Add a list of detailed use cases this enhancement intends to take care of.
Use case 1:
As a user, I would like to understand the drift. (This is an example)
Use case 2:
As a user, I would like to take an action on the deviation/drift. (This is an example)
Implementation Details/Notes/Constraints [optional]
What are the caveats to the implementation? What are some important details that didn't come across above. Go in to as much detail as necessary here. This might be a good place to talk about core concepts and how they relate.
You may have a work-in-progress Pull Request to demonstrate the functioning of the enhancement you are proposing.
Detailed examples
Security Considerations
- How does this proposal impact the security aspects of Argo CD workloads ?
- Are there any unresolved follow-ups that need to be done to make the enhancement more robust ?
Risks and Mitigations
What are the risks of this proposal and how do we mitigate. Think broadly.
For example, consider both security and how this will impact the larger Kubernetes ecosystem.
Consider including folks that also work outside your immediate sub-project.
Upgrade / Downgrade Strategy
If applicable, how will the component be upgraded and downgraded? Make sure this is in the test plan.
Consider the following in developing an upgrade/downgrade strategy for this enhancement:
- What changes (in invocations, configurations, API use, etc.) is an existing cluster required to make on upgrade in order to keep previous behavior?
- What changes (in invocations, configurations, API use, etc.) is an existing cluster required to make on upgrade in order to make use of the enhancement?
Drawbacks
The idea is to find the best form of an argument why this enhancement should not be implemented.
Alternatives
Similar to the Drawbacks section the Alternatives section is used to highlight and record other
possible approaches to delivering the value proposed by an enhancement.