The `base64-js` package was only used in tests that were run only on
Node.js. On Node.js, `Buffer` is available which can natively perform
base64 conversion. By using `Buffer in these Node.js only tests, the
`base64-js` package can be removed from the repository.
PR Close#53464
Consider the case:
```
<button *ngIf="true" [@anim]="field"></button>
```
Only the inner `button` should recieve a `property` instruction for the animation binding. We were previously emitting one for the implicit `ng-template` as well, and collecting it into the consts for the `ng-template`. Both of these issues are now fixed.
PR Close#53457
The behavior of explicit bindings on `ng-template`s was untested, and we differed from `TemplateDefinitionBuilder` significantly. We now have much more similar behavior, although not 100% identical.
For example, consider this templarte:
```
<ng-template l="l1" [p]="p1" [attr.a]="a1" [class.c]="c1"></ng-template>
```
It's not clear what a class binding on an `ng-template` would actually do. Nonetheless, it's well-defined behavior in TemplateDefinitionBuilder, which emits `property` instructions for all three bindings, and people actually do this in google3.
Note that some of these bindings don't really make much sense, but we have to support them for compatibility purposes.
See comments for an in-depth explanation of all the logic.
Also, add a test to exercise the problematic case.
PR Close#53457
It turns out that `BindingFlags.BindingTargetsTemplate` is actally a redundant property! It will be true in either of the following cases:
1. The template is a normal non-structural `ng-template`. We already know this from `TemplateKind`.
2. The binding came from `templateAttrs` (instead of `attrs`). We have this information in `BindingFlags.IsStructuralTemplateAttribute`.
Therefore, I can just eliminate `BindingFlags.BindingTargetsTemplate`. There's no reason to keep `BindingFlags` around for a single value, so I convert `BindingFlags.IsStructuralTemplateAttribute` to a boolean parameter (with the eventual goal of eliminating it entirely).
Additionally, because element binding ingestion now calls `ir.createBindingOp` inline, it was difficult to compare it to template binding ingestion, which uses the `createTemplateBinding` helper. I have changed the parameter order of `createTemplateBinding` to closely mimic `ir.createBindingOp`. This will both make the code easier to read, and allow me to easily replace one with the other in the future.
Lastly: the template binding ingestion function is the site of much of the binding ingestion complexity. Add an explanatory function comment.
PR Close#53457
Previously, we had `ingestBindings` and `ingestBinding`, which required tons of cases to support both elements and templates.
Now, we have two separate functions, `ingestElementBindings` and `ingestTemplateBindings`.
Thanks to the previous refactoring work, `ingestBinding` is now extremely compact. In fact, it's so compact that, in the elements case, it can just be inlined! Therefore, element binding ingestion is now quite easy to read.
The template case continues to be pretty gnarly, although I have already removed some code. In subsequent commits, we will simplify it even further.
PR Close#53457
Currently Template Pipeline's ingest phase is very complex, especially when it comes to ingesting bindings.
In this commit, we make some superficial simplifications, in preparation for a larger refactoring. For example, we pull out common code such as `convertAstWithInterpolation` and the `i18n.Message` checks. This enormously shrinks the main binding ingestion functions.
In addition, we reorder the binding kind and flags code above `ingestBindings`, so that `ingestBindings` and `ingestBinding` can be viewed together.
PR Close#53457
The Template Pipeline has had a number of tricky bugs involving bindings on structural elements.
Consider this template:
```
<div *ngIf="true" [class.bar]="field"></div>
```
We were incorrectly emitting `ɵɵclassProp` on *both* the template's view, and the inner view. The solution is to just emit an extracted attribute on the enclosing template, so it still shows up in the const array, but does not affect the update block.
We will refactor binding ingestion soon, but this commit improves our correctness before any big refactor.
PR Close#53457
The `multimatch` package was only used in the saucelabs test bundling
script to filter out spec files that should be ignored during saucelabs
testing. This functionality can be replaced with `fast-glob` package's
`ignore` option. This removes the need for the `multimatch` package within
the repository.
PR Close#53463
In the original `Promise` impelmentation, zone.js follow the spec from
https://promisesaplus.com/#point-51.
```
const p1 = Promise.resolve(1);
const p2 = Promise.resolve(p1);
p1 === p2; // false
```
in this case, `p2` should be the same status with `p1` but they are
still different instances.
And for some edge case.
```
class MyPromise extends Promise {
constructor(sub) {
super((res) => res(null));
this.sub = sub;
}
then(onFufilled, onRejected) {
this.sub.then(onFufilled, onRejected);
}
}
const p1 = new Promise(setTimeout(res), 100);
const myP = new MyPromise(p1);
const r = await myP;
r === 1; // false
```
So in the above code, `myP` is not the same instance with `p1`,
and since `myP` is resolved in constructor, so `await myP` will
just pass without waiting for `p1`.
And in the current `tc39` spec here https://tc39.es/ecma262/multipage/control-abstraction-objects.html#sec-promise-resolve
`Promise.resolve(subP)` should return `subP`.
```
const p1 = Promise.resolve(1);
const p2 = Promise.resolve(p1);
p1 === p2; // true
```
So the above `MyPromise` can wait for the `p1` correctly.
PR Close#53423
This change replaces the implementation of the multi-map used to store
detached views while reconciling lists. The new implementation optimizes
memory allocation for such map and avoid arrays allocation when there are
no duplicated keys.
PR Close#52245
The repository currently has two globbing packages. To minimize the number of packages in
the framework repository, the uses of the `glob` package are being converted
to `fast-glob` which is used by the tooling repository. The change is mostly mechanical
and in this change the build and test scripts are converted.
PR Close#53397
Several unused babel related dependencies can be removed:
* `@babel/preset-env` was previously used for ngcc tests but ngcc has been removed. It used here: 3569fdf451/packages/compiler-cli/ngcc/test/BUILD.bazel (L84)
* `@babel/helper-replace-supers` was added during a manual lock file update to workaround issues with since removed babel packages
PR Close#53441
These patches are no longer necessary with the current state of the
type packages and the code within the repository. The types are now
included in the already required babel.d.ts file for the relevant
babel packages (currently: `@babel/core` and `@babel/generator`).
PR Close#53441
The `@babel/core` package provides the functionality of multiple other babel packages
without the need to directly depend or import the other babel packages. Since the
`@babel/core` package is already used and imported in the locations that previously
used the other babel packages, an overall reduction in both imports and dependencies
is possible. Six babel related packages were able to be removed from the root `package.json`
and one (also present in the aforementioned six) was removed as a dependency from the
`@angular/localize` package. Unfortunately, the functionality used from the `@babel/generator`
package is not provided by `@babel/core` and is still present. Further refactoring may
allow its removal as well in the future.
The following packages were removed:
* @babel/parser
* @babel/template
* @babel/traverse
* @babel/types
* @types/babel__template
* @types/babel__traverse
PR Close#53441
Phases that walk through the views by following template and repeater
ops need to remember to check the empty view as well for repeaters. This
commit adds fixes for phases that were missing it, or comments
explaining why its not handled.
PR Close#53440
@for does not use actual TemplateOps, but instead has a similar
RepeaterCreateOp. This commit adds support for this op to the relevant
i18n phases.
PR Close#53440
When using ternaries or other expressions in bound if / else cases, it is possible that line breaks could end up affecting template replacement.
fixes: #53428
PR Close#53435
This separates application and platform code into even more files. This now removes
the ciruclar dependency between scheduling and application ref.
PR Close#53371
To support the development of component specific HMR capabilities, the build/serve
tooling may need to directly process styles to match the view encapsulation
expectations of individual components. To allow for this scenario and to avoid tooling
to need to re-implement the emulated encapsulation logic, an private API is now
available in the `@angular/compiler` package named `encapsulateStyle` that converts
a stylesheet content string to an encapsulated form. This function is not considered
part of the public API nor does it have any of its respective support or versioning guarantees.
PR Close#53363
This test actually passes, template pipeline just orders the translated
messages and consts array differently. Since the order isn't important,
we just fork off an alternate golden file for template pipeline.
PR Close#53459
I discovered this failure while looking at presubmit results. We appear to still have ordering issues, when more update ops are present.
PR Close#53405
While running a g3 presubmit, I discovered two related novel failure modes:
1. Simple case: this new test uses an `ngFor` structural directive, which binds a context variable. That variable is immediately used in an attribute binding. It looks like we generate an extra attribute instruction, which might result in an invalid property read at runtime.
2. Complex case: this is another attribute binding, this time on a structural element, inside of an `ng-template`. Not sure what's going on here.
PR Close#53405
Previously, binding ops only knew whether they applied to a structural template (and even this was actually very misleading!).
Now, binding ops have full information about what kind of template they apply to, if any (e.g. plain template, structural template, etc). Additionally, each binding knows whether it `IsStructuralTemplateAttribute`, which is a property of the binding rather than the template target.
In the future, we should refactor this to unify the various flags that can describe binding types, as well as the flags that describe template targets, into a single and comprehensive field on binding ops.
PR Close#53405
Previously, we created i18n contexts for i18n attributes in ingest. This turned out to be the wrong approach, because we don't always want to produce i18n messages for all i18n attributes! In fact, several kinds of i18n attributes on elements with structural directives should not produce their own messages.
This commit also contains related refactors to fix one such structural directives test.
PR Close#53405
When a binding is present on an element with a structural directive, that binding is parsed onto *both* the synthetic `ng-template`, as well as the inner element. However, we do not want to create different i18n messages for both bindings; we only want to generate a new i18n message for the inner, "real" element.
PR Close#53405
Listener instructions should not be inside the i18n block. In order to avoid this, we ingest bindings on an element before starting the i18n block.
We previously missed this case because almost all bindings result in *update* instructions, which don't need to be ordered relative to i18nStart/i18nEnd create instructions. However, listeners are the only kind of binding that gets ingested into the create block.
PR Close#53405
Previously, our i18n slot moving process was buggy. Specifically, it was not resilient to cases in which a create op consumed a slot, but no update ops depended on that slot.
The new algorithm fixes this issue, and is also easier to understand.
PR Close#53405
The PR https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/52465 introduced short-circuit for
the signal equality invocation - with the reasoning that the equality function
should never return false for arguments with the same references. In practice it
turned out that it is rather surprising and the subsequent PR
https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/52532 added a warning when the short-circuit
was taking priority over the equality function.
Still, the presence of the short-circuit prevents people from mutating objects in
place and based on https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/52735 this is a common
and desired scenario. This change removes the short-circuit altogether and thus
fixes the mentioned issue.
We do recognize that removing short-circuit exposes developers to the potentially
surprising logic where mutated in-place change won't be propagated throug the
reactivity graph (due to the deault equality function). But we assume that this might
be less surprising / more desirable as compared to the short-circuit logic.
Fixes#52735
PR Close#53446
This change fixes and issue where the expectation was that change
detection always goes through `detectChangesInView`. In reality,
`detectChangesInternal` directly calls `refreshView`
and refreshes a view directly without checking if it was dirty (to my discontent).
This update changes the implementation of `detectChangesInternal` to
actually be "detect changes" not "force refresh of root view and detect
changes". In addition, it adds the refresh flag to APIs that were
previously calling `detectChangesInternal` so we get the same behavior
as before (host view is forced to refresh).
Note that the use of `RefreshView` instead of `Dirty` is _intentional_
here. The `RefreshView` flag is cleared before refreshing the view while
the `Dirty` flag is cleared at the very end. Using the `Dirty` flag
could have consequences because it is a more long-lasting change to the
view flags. Because `detectChangesInView` will immediately clear the
`RefreshView` flag, this change is much more limited and does not
result in a different set of flags during the view refresh.
PR Close#53021
The component fixture dependencies have to be passed in manually. This
is a bit annoying to manage as we expand which dependencies are needed.
Instead, we can run the constructor in the TestBed injection context and
move the dependencies into the component fixture code, as is done with
other constructors in Angular.
PR Close#53400
These patches are no longer necessary with the current state of the
type packages and the code within the repository. The types are now
included in the already required babel.d.ts file for the relevant
babel packages (currently: `@babel/core` and `@babel/generator`).
PR Close#53374
The `@babel/core` package provides the functionality of multiple other babel packages
without the need to directly depend or import the other babel packages. Since the
`@babel/core` package is already used and imported in the locations that previously
used the other babel packages, an overall reduction in both imports and dependencies
is possible. Six babel related packages were able to be removed from the root `package.json`
and one (also present in the aforementioned six) was removed as a dependency from the
`@angular/localize` package. Unfortunately, the functionality used from the `@babel/generator`
package is not provided by `@babel/core` and is still present. Further refactoring may
allow its removal as well in the future.
The following packages were removed:
* @babel/parser
* @babel/template
* @babel/traverse
* @babel/types
* @types/babel__template
* @types/babel__traverse
PR Close#53374
