The browserUrlTree is only used to support the onSameUrlNavigation: 'ignore' logic. We can achieve this functionality without having this state tracked inside the Router. Instead, we can re-examine what ignore means: We don't want to rerun the matching logic, guards, or resolvers when we already know that nothing is changing.
Outside of the "navigated", there are two things that constitute a "change":
1. The browser URL might change. Because of skipLocationChange, the browser URL might not always match the internal state of the Router (we can navigate to a path but skip updating the browser URL). If we're navigating to a place that would change the browser URL, we should process the navigation. Theoretically, all we need to really do is update the browser URL instead of processing the whole navigation w/ guards, redirects, and resolvers. But this doesn't matter that much because the default value for runGuardsAndResolvers will skip all of this anyways.
2. The internal state of the Router might change. That is, we're navigating to a new path and may or may not be updating the updating the browser URL.
If either of the above are true, we process the navigation. If both are false, we aren't changing anything so we can safely ignore the navigation request (as long as onSameUrlNavigation === 'ignore').
Why is this change important?
* Simplification of Router internals. The Router has a lot of special case handling and one-offs to handle a limited set of scenarios. Removing these when possible makes the code easier to follow
PR Close#48065
`RouterTestingModule` is not needed as of v16. Instead, TestBed
automatically provides `MockPlatformLocation` in order to help test
navigations in the application. The location mocks in the
RouterTestingModule aren't necessary anymore.
There doesn't appear to be any real documentation around
`RouterTestingModule` other than the API docs.
PR Close#49427
The ESM js files need to be referenced, and the router tests rely
on `async/await` with change detection- so a special rule is required
that downlevels `async/await` to generators (similar to the Angular CLI)
PR Close#48521
This code mimics behavior that Google Analytics has been using to
prevent duplicate navigations. They set up their own `HybridRoutingService`
location sync to avoid duplicate navigations that came from the Angular
router. This would happen because the Angular router would trigger a
navigation, which would then get picked up by the `$locationShim`, which
would trigger a `$locationChangeStart`, which would then be picked up by
the `setUpLocationSync` watcher here, which would again trigger a
navigation in the Angular Router.
All of this can be prevented by checking if the `navigationId` exists on
the history state object. This property is added by the Angular router
during navigations.
fixes#21610
PR Close#43441
This updates the router upgrade tests to use less mocked behavior. The
test upgrade location module is copied from the one that's used in the
common package. This update to the tests verifies more real behavior of
the upgrade module.
PR Close#43441
This is a breaking change in nodejs rules 0.40.0 as part of the API review & cleanup for the 1.0 release. Their APIs are identical as ts_web_test was just karma_web_test without the config_file attribute.
PR Close#33802
The `setUpLocationSync` function in @angular/router/upgrade didn't previously let you sync hash-based navigations. With this change, you can now pass an option to `setUpLocationSync` that will make sure location changes run in Angular in hash-based apps.
Fixes#24429#21995
PR Close#28609
(FW-777)
When an Injector is provided, R3Injector instantiates it by calling its
constructor instead of its factory, not resolving dependencies.
With this fix, the ngInjectorDef is checked and the factory is correctly
used if it is found.
PR Close#27456
We are close enough to blacklist a few test targets, rather than whitelist targets to run...
Because bazel rules can be composed of other rules that don't inherit tags automatically,
I had to explicitly mark all of our ts_library and ng_module targes with "ivy-local" and
"ivy-jit" tags so that we can create a query that excludes all fixme- tagged targets even
if those targets are composed of other targets that don't inherit this tag.
This is the updated overview of ivy related bazel tags:
- ivy-only: target that builds or runs only under ivy
- fixme-ivy-jit: target that doesn't yet build or run under ivy with --compile=jit
- fixme-ivy-local: target that doesn't yet build or run under ivy with --compile=local
- no-ivy-jit: target that is not intended to build or run under ivy with --compile=jit
- no-ivy-local: target that is not intended to build or run under ivy with --compile=local
PR Close#26471
