We are already testing the JIT transforms via integration tests, but
this commit adds dedicated unit tests for the transform behavior for
proper test coverage (planned follow-up).
PR Close#54841
Move the initialization of class field `DelegatingPerfRecorder` into the constructor.
This fixes the error : `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'eventCount')`
This is blocking the roll-out of public class.
PR Close#54834
The logic in `isCssClassMatching` is only interested in two areas in the attributes:
implicit attributes and the `AttributeMarker.Classes` area, with the first area only
of interest for projection matching, not directive matching. This commit splits these
two searches to make this more apparent.
PR Close#54800
This commit resolves a regression that was introduced when the compiler switched from
`TemplateDefinitionBuilder` (TDB) to the template pipeline (TP) compiler. The TP compiler
has changed the output of
```html
if (false) { <div class="test"></div> }
```
from
```ts
defineComponent({
consts: [['class', 'test'], [AttributeMarker.Classes, 'test']],
template: function(rf) {
if (rf & 1) {
ɵɵtemplate(0, App_Conditional_0_Template, 2, 0, "div", 0)
}
}
});
```
to
```ts
defineComponent({
consts: [[AttributeMarker.Classes, 'test']],
template: function(rf) {
if (rf & 1) {
ɵɵtemplate(0, App_Conditional_0_Template, 2, 0, "div", 0)
}
}
});
```
The last argument to the `ɵɵtemplate` instruction (0 in both compilation outputs) corresponds with
the index in `consts` of the element's attribute's, and we observe how TP has allocated only a single
attribute array for the `div`, where there used to be two `consts` entries with TDB. Consequently,
the `ɵɵtemplate` instruction is now effectively referencing a different attributes array, where the
distinction between the `"class"` attribute vs. the `AttributeMarker.Classes` distinction affects
the behavior: TP's emit causes the runtime to incorrectly match a directive with `selector: '.foo'` to
be instantiated on the `ɵɵtemplate` instruction as if it corresponds with a structural directive!
Instead of changing TP to align with TDB's emit, this commit updates the runtime instead. This uncovered
an inconsistency in selector matching for class names, where there used to be two paths dealing with
class matching:
1. The first check was commented to be a special-case for class matching, implemented in `isCssClassMatching`.
2. The second path was part of the main selector matching algorithm, where `findAttrIndexInNode` was being used
to find the start position in `tNode.attrs` to match the selector's value against.
The second path only considers `AttributeMarker.Classes` values if matching for content projection, OR of the
`TNode` is not an inline template. The special-case in path 1 however does not make that distinction, so it
would consider the `AttributeMarker.Classes` binding as a selector match, incorrectly causing a directive to
match on the `ɵɵtemplate` itself.
The second path was also buggy for class bindings, as the return value of `classIndexOf` was incorrectly
negated: it considered a matching class attribute as non-matching and vice-versa. This bug was not observable
because of another issue, where the class-handling in part 2 was never relevant because of the special-case
in part 1.
This commit separates path 1 entirely from path 2 and removes the buggy class-matching logic in part 2, as
that is entirely handled by path 1 anyway. `isCssClassMatching` is updated to exclude class bindings from
being matched for inline templates.
Fixes#54798
PR Close#54800
The paths for the security guide were flipped in the original PR. As a result, it looked for a markdown file in the best-practices directory when it should have looked for it in the guide directory instead.
PR Close#54830
Add an internal API to enable and use i18n hydration for testing and development. This helps ensure that we don't accidentally break the current behavior until we are completely ready to roll out i18n support.
PR Close#54784
Currently if an `(output)` listener fails, it will be handled gracefully
by Angular and reported to the `ErrorHandler`.
For programmatic subscriptions with `OutputEmitterRef`, this is not the case.
Instead, as soon as any subscription is failing, all other subsequent
subscription callbacks are not firing anymore.
This commit intends to make this more consistent by gracefully
reporting errors from `OutputEmitterRef#emit` to `ErrorHandler`,
allowing for listener execution to continue.
PR Close#54821
Ensures that all of the functions intended to be run in initializers are in an injection context. This is a stop-gap until we have a compiler diagnostic for it.
PR Close#54761
This commits assert that the repeater instruction gets a reference
to a tracking function. This change will allow us to better track
occurences of https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/53628 -
in certain situations a reference to a tracking function might be
undefiened.
We are not fixing the underlying issue here, just getting better
visibility.
PR Close#54814
Speeds up the retrieval of `DestroyRef` in `EventEmitter` because
`try/catch` is expensive if there is no injection context.
We saw a script time regression in Cloud.
The goldens had to be updated because `getInjectImplementation` is now
referenced. `inject` also references the underlying field, but directly.
This is super minimal overhead of a function exposing the internal
field.
PR Close#54748
This commit updates HTML sanitization logic to avoid infinite loops in case clobbered elements contain fields like `nextSibling` or `parentNode`. Those fields are used for DOM traversal and this update makes sure that those calls return valid results.
Also this commit fixes an issue when clobbering `nodeName` causes JS exceptions.
PR Close#54425
An i18n message effectively acts as a dynamic template: two elements with contiguous instruction indices won't necessarily be contiguous in the DOM.
For that reason, we need to maintain a mapping from instruction index to a physical DOM node in order to hydrate views with i18n, pointing to where hydration for that view should begin.
PR Close#54750
Updates the instruction generation for two-way bindings to only emit the `twoWayBindingSet` call when writing to template variables. Since template variables are constants, it's only allowed to write to them when they're signals. Non-signal values are flagged during template type checking.
Fixes#54670.
PR Close#54714
We have a diagnostic that reports writes to template variables which worked both for regular event bindings and two-way bindings, however the latter was broken by #54154 because two-way bindings no longer had a `PropertyWrite` AST.
These changes fix the diagnostic and expand it to allow two-way bindings to template variables that are signals.
PR Close#54714
Moves the check which ensures that there are no writes to template variables into the `TemplateSemanticsChecker` to prepare for the upcoming changes.
PR Close#54714
Introduces a new `TemplateSemanticsChecker` that will be used to flag semantic errors in the user's template. Currently we do some of this in the type check block, but the problem is that it doesn't have access to the template type checker which prevents us from properly checking cases like #54670. This pass is also distinct from the extended template checks, because we don't want users to be able to turn the checks off and we want them to run even if `strictTemplates` are disabled.
PR Close#54714
The `runCallbackOnce` closure is declared not to have any parameters itself, so it is
compatible as `queueMicrotask` callback without the extra closure. This reduces the call
stack by a frame and avoids the extra closure allocation.
PR Close#54801
This commit addresses a typing mismatch, where these functions were declared to return whichever
value their callback returned, but this was inaccurate: it's always a test callback function
with `done` argument.
PR Close#54801
The assertion in `packages/core/test/acceptance/after_render_hook_spec.ts:165` was prone to flakes,
where Jasmine could frequently report an error:
```
Error: 'expect' was used when there was no current spec, this could be because an asynchronous test timed out
at Env.expect (node_modules/jasmine-core/lib/jasmine-core/jasmine.js:1945:15)
at expect (node_modules/jasmine-core/lib/jasmine-core/jasmine.js:8267:18)
at file:///packages/core/test/acceptance/after_render_hook_spec.ts:165:12
```
This happens because `wrapTestFn` checks for an exact type of `Promise`, which may have been patched by zone.js
such that the `instanceof` condition is dependent on whether zone.js has patched the `Promise` constructor.
PR Close#54801
There is an edge case where synchronous navigations caused in
response to navigation events can result in a previous navigation not
being unsubscribed from. b/328219996
PR Close#54710
This commit ensures that render hooks are rerun when a node is attached
or detached. We do not necessarily need to run change detection but DOM
did change so render hooks should execute.
PR Close#54083
This commit updates the `afterRender` and `afterNextRender` hooks to
notify the scheduler (which subsequently schedules change detection)
when created. This makes the hooks similar to `requestAnimationFrame`,
which requests that the browser schedule a rendering operation. This
reqeust is not conditional. Even if there was nothing to repaint, the
`requestAnimationFrame` callback will execute.
In Angular, this is useful because callers of `afterNextRender` don't
necessarily have any way of knowing whether a change detection is even
scheduled. For example, the anchor scrolling with the Angular Router
needs to wait for rendering to complete before attempting to scroll
because rendering can affect the size of the page. However, if the user
is already on the page that the navigation is targeting, such as
navigating to an anchor on the page, there is nothing new for the Router
to render so a render might not even be scheduled.
Related to https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/53985, which
could use `afterNextRender` instead of `setTimeout` to ensure the
scrolling happens in the same frame as the page rendering, but would not
necessarily work without this change (as described above). Note that the
scrolling _cannot_ use a microtask to ensure scrolling happens in the
same frame because `NgZone` will ensure microtasks flush before
change detection, so it would cause the scroll to happen before rendering.
PR Close#54083
