The directive implemnetation might set CVA values during the template evaluation. Since the template is a reactive context we need to untrack when setting the CVA values to prevent writing to signals in a reactive context.
fixes#64614
PR Close#64618
Renames the field state related to metadata to reflect the new
"metadata" name. In particular:
- `property(...)` is renamed to `metadata(...)`
- `hasProperty(...)` is renamed to `hasMetadata(...)`
PR Close#64603
Renames logic functions related to metadata to align with the new
"metadata" name. Notably:
- `property(...)` => `metadata(...)`
- `aggregateProperty(...)` => `aggregateMetadata(...)`
PR Close#64603
These have been renamed to `MetadataKey` and `AggregateMetadataKey`
respectively. The team consensus is that the term "property" is so
overloaded that it makes the topic difficult to explain & discuss, hence
the rename.
PR Close#64603
Prior to this change, `FieldState` defined a signal for each built-in
property. This unfortunately meant that the `Field` directive had no way
of knowing which property had actually been defined in the schema, and
would thus attempt to propagate them all to the bound form control. This
meant that the default values of these signals would override the
default or template defined values of these control properties.
Now these properties are `undefined` by default, and only initialized if
defined in the schema. Thus the `Field` directive will not attempt to
bind any properties that aren't explicitly managed by the schema.
PR Close#64446
Note that unlike the other built-in properties, `pattern` is not
propagated to native controls so the lack of symmetry with other
property tests is intentional.
PR Close#64446
Currently it's easy to make a mistake when accessing properties on `SimpleChanges`, because the keys aren't typed. These changes add an optional generic to the interface so that users can get a compilation error if they make a typo.
A few things to note:
1. The generic argument is optional and we revert to the old behavior if one isn't passed for backwards compatibility.
2. All of the keys are optional, because they aren't guaranteed to be present for any `ngOnChanges` invocation.
3. We unwrap the values of input signals to match the behavior at runtime.
Fixes#17560.
PR Close#64535
These methods are only intended to be used internally within framework
instructions. Prefix them with `ɵ` to indicate that they are
framework-private and should not be called from user code.
PR Close#64471
Add support for interoperability between signal forms and reactive forms that
commit effccffde0 had removed.
A signal forms field can once again be bound to any element or component with a
`ControlValueAccessor`.
PR Close#64471
When a directive injects a `ViewContainerRef`, the runtime inserts a container that was throwing off the logic that recognizes native controls.
These changes switch to check if the node is a native control through the `TNode`. This also makes it a bit less prone to breaking during SSR.
Fixes#64362.
PR Close#64368
Caches information about the kind of form control that a `TNode`
represents in `TNodeFlags`. This avoids redundant computations on
subsequent template create and update passes.
Renames the `INVALID_CONTROL_HOST` error code to
`INVALID_FIELD_DIRECTIVE_HOST` for clarity and adds a test for it.
PR Close#64351
Renames the control directive and the input that users set to bind a
field to a UI control.
Previously users would do:
```
<input [control]="someField">
```
Now users will do:
```
<input [filed]="someField">
```
PR Close#64300
Fix a bug where the min property of a form field was not correctly
propagated to custom controls. Also ensure that min and max are only
bound to native input elements that support them.
PR Close#63884
Fix several typos caught by the added test cases:
* `disabled` attribute for native controls
* `readonly` property for custom controls
Note that the `name` test cases have been marked `pending()` due to
https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/63882.
PR Close#63884
Move most of the implementation of the `Control` directive into core
framework instructions. This allows field state changes to be propagated
to their corresponding UI controls directly during execution of a
template update block, instead of relying on `effect()`s to synchronize
each change later during the update (and too late in the case of
required inputs).
* Define a private API in `@angular/core` for signal forms to implement:
* `ɵControl` for the `Control` directive.
* `ɵFieldState` for the control's associated `FieldState`.
* Emit specialized instructions when compiling a `[control]` binding:
* `ɵɵcontrolCreate` sets up the `ɵControl` directive if present,
determines whether it's bound to a native control element or a
custom control component, and adds the appropriate event listeners
to notify the `ɵFieldState` of UI changes.
* `ɵɵcontrol` propagates changes from `ɵFieldState` properties to their
corresponding UI control properties (in additional to binding the `control`
property itself).
PR Close#63773
There are two primary reasons for this renaming:
1. It better reflects the actual nature of the proxy object, namely that
the form is represented as a tree, and that this object is used for
navigating the tree structure (while `FieldState` is used for getting
the state at a particular point in the structure).
2. This frees up the name `Field` to be used for the directive that
binds a `FieldTree` to a UI control.
PR Close#64214
Since those are top level APIs, `ngDevMode` might not be available at runtime if they're invoked before the variable is set.
fixes#62796
PR Close#63875
This updates tests and examples only to prepare for zoneless by default.
These changes were identified and made as part of #63382. Anything that
failed gets `provideZoneChangeDetection` unless the fixes were easily
and quickly determined.
It also adds the zoneless provider to the `initTestEnvironment` calls
for tests in this repo to prevent regressions before #63382 is merged.
PR Close#63668
Moves the control directive under api/ since it is part of the public
API. Also removes the interop abstract control from the public API
PR Close#63616
Adds additional handling for input types that handle numbers:
- number
- range
- datetime-local
As well as input types that handle dates:
- date
- month
- week
- time
- *not* datetime-local which does not allow setting valueAsDate
This PR allows binding either a `Field<string>` or `Field<number>` to
the number type inputs and a `Field<string>`, `Field<numebr>`, or
`Field<Date | null>` to the date type inputs. Binding uses the
corresponding `.value`, `.valueAsNumber`, or `.valueAsDate` according to
the type of the `Field`.
When reading new values out of the input, the `Control` directive will
read the property that aligns with the type of the existing value in the
`Field` and write back the same type.
PR Close#63585
