| .. | ||
| README.md | ||
| scrum.md | ||
Engineering rituals
This folder contains concise, tactical guides for the recurring engineering rituals ("ceremonies") practiced at Fleet. These docs exist to make the rituals easy to run and improve by:
- Clarifying purpose (why we do the ritual)
- Listing roles, inputs, and expected outputs
- Supplying lightweight agendas / checklists and any timeboxes
- Capturing tips, gotchas, and decision charts that help them run smoothly
Authoritative definitions of process and policy live in the public Fleet handbook (https://fleetdm.com/handbook). Ritual docs here are intentionally practical and should avoid duplicating full policy text. When a definition changes in the handbook, update links or brief summaries here (do not fork the process).
Adding or updating a ritual doc
- Create a new markdown file named after the ritual (e.g.
sprint-demo.md,oncall-handoff.md). - Start with an
## Overviewsection (Purpose, Cadence, Participants, Primary artifacts). - Provide an Agenda / Flow section with ordered or bulleted steps and explicit timeboxes where useful.
- Include decision aids (Mermaid diagrams, tables) only when they accelerate the ritual (keep them small and actionable).
- Link to the relevant handbook sections for deeper context instead of duplicating content.
- Keep the tone instructional and brief. Remove information that drifts into historical narrative.
- Add the new file to the list below.
Current ritual docs
- Scrum – daily standup focus and incoming bug review flowchart (overview + decision chart). Canonical process: https://fleetdm.com/handbook/company/product-groups#scrum-at-fleet
Future candidates (create when there is persistent friction)
These are examples; only add if a stable, repeatable ritual with clear ownership emerges:
- Sprint demo (live run checklist, recording tips)
- Sprint retrospective variations
- Estimation session facilitation
- Incident review (if / when standardized beyond existing handbook guidance)
Maintenance
Ritual owners (usually the EM or designated facilitator) should review their doc at least quarterly, or immediately after a retrospective surfaces a change. Keep PRs small and link to the retrospective or decision that prompted the update.