Elgato_dark/fleet
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fleetdm/fleet synced 2026-05-23 17:08:53 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 83

Fix expected number of hosts in fleetctl-preview-latest workflow (#13329)

Browse source 
#13182

[This PR](https://github.com/fleetdm/osquery-in-a-box/pull/18) in the
osquery-in-a-box repository recently added a new host to the simulated
host list which broke the CI job in the fleetdm/fleet repository.

PR run with this branch:
https://github.com/fleetdm/fleet/actions/runs/5866786432

PS: One of the reasons we had this osquery-in-a-box repository outside
the monorepo was to not break customers using `fleetctl preview`. But
now that we have Fleet Sandbox and we don't encourage users to use
`fleetctl preview`:
1. Does it  make sense to have the separate repository?
2. Does it make sense to continue supporting this workflow in CI?
This commit is contained in:
Lucas Manuel Rodriguez 2023-08-15 14:16:07 -03:00 committed by GitHub
parent fc944f6065
commit f9d6cf986b
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
.github/workflows/fleetctl-preview-latest.yml vendored
View file

@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ jobs:
./build/fleetctl preview --std-query-lib-file-path $(pwd)/docs/01-Using-Fleet/standard-query-library/standard-query-library.yml
sleep 10
./build/fleetctl get hosts | tee hosts.txt
[ $( cat hosts.txt | grep online | wc -l) -eq 8 ]
[ $( cat hosts.txt | grep online | wc -l) -eq 9 ]
- name: Get fleet logs
run: |