From 1becf7ebe6af388fa5c2a8557f2f2ff671437cfa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luke Heath Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 15:41:06 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Add engineering-initiated stories back to handbook (#16656) In favor of being succinct, I omitted the specifics. Let me know if you think I should add them or if this PR is reference enough: 1. Not more than 10% of the sprint. 2. Not every sprint; only when there is clear business value. 3. Is used for boring solutions only (not chasing new and shiny tech). 4. I will be DRI for determining when and what to prioritize. I will tag @noahtalerman any time this happens. 5. @noahtalerman's decision if it changes an interface (UI/API/CLI) or config surface or changes that require extra work from users (uptime or manual migration). --- handbook/company/product-groups.md | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/handbook/company/product-groups.md b/handbook/company/product-groups.md index caaf19b3e4..de84c82e37 100644 --- a/handbook/company/product-groups.md +++ b/handbook/company/product-groups.md @@ -141,16 +141,15 @@ User stories are small and independently valuable. - Is it small enough? Will this task be likely to fit in 1 sprint when estimated? - Is it valuable enough? Will this task drive business value when released, independent of other tasks? - #### Defining "done" To successfully deliver a user story, the people working on it need to know what "done" means.