## Summary
Fixes the CI build failure in the `task-ts-build` workflow caused by
Foundry v1.4.2's Solar linter not being able to resolve Snowbridge's
context-specific import remappings.
## Problem
The Snowbridge submodule uses context-specific remappings (prefixed with
`:`) for its dependencies:
- `lib/snowbridge/contracts/:openzeppelin/` → OpenZeppelin contracts
- `lib/snowbridge/contracts/:prb/math/` → PRB Math library
Foundry v1.4.2's Solar linter doesn't understand these context-specific
remappings and fails with errors like:
```
error: file openzeppelin/utils/cryptography/MerkleProof.sol not found
error: file prb/math/src/UD60x18.sol not found
```
## Solution
Added global remappings that the linter can understand:
```toml
"openzeppelin/=lib/snowbridge/contracts/lib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/",
"prb/math/=lib/snowbridge/contracts/lib/prb-math/",
```
### Why This Works
- The linter can now resolve `openzeppelin/` and `prb/math/` imports
globally
- These global remappings take **lower precedence** than
context-specific ones during compilation
- The compiler still uses the context-specific remappings (with `:`)
when compiling Snowbridge contracts
- The linter uses the global remappings when checking all files
## Changes
### Commit 1: Add global remappings
- `contracts/foundry.toml`: Added 2 global remapping entries
### Commit 2: Apply forge fmt
- Applied automatic formatting via `forge fmt` to ensure code style
consistency
- Multi-line formatting for long import statements and function
signatures
- No functional changes - purely formatting updates
## Testing
✅ Local build succeeds with `forge build`
✅ No Snowbridge import resolution errors
✅ `forge fmt --check` passes with no formatting issues
✅ Only linting notes/warnings remain (not errors)
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
We remove `calculateMerkleRootUnsorted` and `buildMerkleProofUnsorted`
and instead introduce a new parameter `sorting`. This parameter
`sorting` will indicate if we need to sort the pair before hashing the
new node.
## Summary of changes
- We decided to remove the topics and nonce from the massage encoding
since we don't use them (original commit:
ee2a3f2fd4).
- Besides, we already have a nonce at the Snowbridge message level
f4ab5c2b2e/operator/primitives/snowbridge/inbound-queue/src/v2/message.rs (L105)
- I had to recreate the static test for _encoding_ (happens in
[DataHavenSnowbridgeMessages.sol](d12d40634f/contracts/src/libraries/DataHavenSnowbridgeMessages.sol)
) / _decoding_ (happens in
[operator/primitives/bridge/src/lib.rs)](f9f9cc65fe/operator/primitives/bridge/src/lib.rs).
Now it matches the current structure. The idea is that now we can test
that we don't break the decoding in followup refactoring.
- Fixes a problem with EigenLayer validator addresses. In all our
contracts we were using `bytes32` to refer to a Solochain validator
address. But on our Substrate change we actually expect AccountId20, so
only 20 bytes. This was causing the decoding to fail.
- I opted for the minimal change that would be to take the right-most 20
bytes to send that to our chain. But we might want aswell to limit our
EigenLayer contracts to be only 20 bytes long. @ahmadkaouk showcase this
[here](92a34c273c)
- Adds a bash script to run the static test. The test will compile the
contracts, run the encoding test, compile the operator, and run the
decoding test. This saves a huge amount of time since we don't need to
run the full e2e setup. The way of running it is the following:
```bash
cd operator/test/scripts
./test_message_encoding.sh
```
- As a consequence of this PR, the execution relayer now works properly.
EDIT:
> [!IMPORTANT]
**We decided to use 20-byte addresses in our contracts**. So what is
stated above is not valid anymore.
The change implies that the mapping from Ethereum addresses to bytes32
addresses now it's a mapping as follows:
dd3ba99ac0/contracts/src/DataHavenServiceManager.sol (L51-L52)
I've updated helper functions, tests, etc to be compliant with this
change. The execution relayer and beefy relayer look stable now.
---------
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Kaouk <ahmadkaouk.93@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Kaouk <56095276+ahmadkaouk@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR improves the CLI to get from the deployments the
`RewardsRegistryAddress` (address of the RewardsRegistry contract
deployed), `RewardsAgentOrigin` (origin used for the agent in charge of
updating the rewards merkle root in the RewardsRegistry contract) and
`RewardsUpdateSelector` (function selector of the function that the
agent must execute to do the aforementioned update) and then set these
values in the `parameters` pallet of the runtime.
After these changes the rewards merkle root is being updated on the
Ethereum side. 🎉
This PR adds the `setup-validators` Typescript script that, given an
already started up network, sets up a new validator set and sends it
through Snowbridge's Gateway to the solochain. To accomplish that
purpose, this PR:
- Modifies the `DeployLocal` script to save in the `anvil.json` file not
only the deployed strategies' addresses but also the owner of each
strategy's underlying token. This owner is used as the source of funds
to transfer tokens to other validators so they can register under that
strategy.
- Adds an `OPERATOR_SOLOCHAIN_ADDRESS` to the `Accounts` utility script
contract. This address is the one used as the Solochain address when
registering a new Operator.
- Updates the `SignUpOperator` (which I believe is now deprecated since
we have multiple Operator Sets) and `SignUpOperatorBase` scripts to
adapt to both aforementioned changes.
- Updates the `ELScriptStorage` script to save the new extra information
of each deployed strategy (the creator of the underlying token) in
storage.
- Adds a `validator-set.json` file which contains the validators that
should be registered in the AVS and sent to the Solochain network
through the Snowbridge Gateway when starting any integration test. This
is currently hardcoded but could be generated in any other way, giving
us flexibility for testing.
- Adds both a Markdown file and a Excalidraw diagram showcasing both how
the setup of integration tests work and possible integration tests that
will be added in a future PR. This list is not exahustive as there are
many more scenarios we will want to test using integration tests.
- Updates the `e2e-cli.ts` script to execute the validator setup when
bootstrapping the network used for integration testing.
---------
Co-authored-by: Facundo Farall <37149322+ffarall@users.noreply.github.com>
