## Summary
This PR introduces support for deploying Datahaven contracts to
different chains (hoodi, holesky, mainnet), as well as a new cli command
to manage this deployment separately from the regular deployment, while
maintaining compatibility with it.
#### New CLI command
- **`bun cli contracts deploy`** - Deploy contracts to supported chains
(Hoodi, Holesky, Mainnet)
- **`bun cli contracts status`** - Check deployment configuration and
status
- **`bun cli contracts verify`** - Verify contracts on block explorers
- Commands need the chain parameter: `--chain <hoodi | holesky |
mainnet>`
- Right now only `hoodi` and `holesky` are supported
### Deployment
#### Hoodi & Holesky Network Support
- Added **DeployBase.s.sol** as common ground for
**DeployTestnet.s.sol** (also new) and **DeployLocal.s.sol** (existing).
- **Hoodi configuration** (`contracts/config/hoodi.json`) with deployed
EigenLayer contract addresses to reference.
- **Holesky configuration** (`contracts/config/hoodi.json`) with
deployed EigenLayer contract addresses to reference.
#### Contracts being deployed
- **DataHaven**: ServiceManager, VetoableSlasher, RewardsRegistry
- **Snowbridge**: BeefyClient, AgentExecutor, Gateway, RewardsAgent
- **EigenLayer**: References existing deployed contracts (not
re-deployed)
#### Deployment files
When the deployment is done, a new file under `contracts/deployments` is
generated with the addresses of the deployed contracts, for each chain
(it will be overriden per chain if run multiple times). So we would have
one `anvil.json`, `hoodi.json`, `holesky.json`, etc, with the addresses
of the deployed contracts for reference and for later verification.
#### Todo
- [x] Test compatibility with existing `bun cli launch` and `bun cli
deploy` commands
#### For follow-up PRs
- Fix verification issue with `foundry verify-contracts` when specifying
the `chain` or `chain-id` parameter, needed for hoodi
(https://github.com/foundry-rs/foundry/issues/7466).
- Add `redeploy` feature to only override implementation contract and
leave the proxy address untouched
## Usage Examples
```bash
# Deploy to Hoodi network
bun cli contracts deploy --chain hoodi
# Check deployment status
bun cli contracts status --chain hoodi
# Verify contracts on block explorer
bun cli contracts verify --chain hoodi
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **New Features**
* Added deployment and configuration support for new networks "hoodi"
and "holesky", including new configuration and deployment files.
* Introduced a CLI tool for managing contract deployments, status
checks, and verification across supported chains.
* Added example environment configuration and comprehensive deployment
documentation.
* Enabled contract verification and status reporting via the CLI with
support for block explorer integration.
* **Improvements**
* Refactored deployment scripts for modularity, supporting both local
and testnet environments.
* Centralized and extended configuration loading to support additional
contract addresses and network parameters.
* Enhanced deployment utilities and typings to support multi-network
deployments.
* **Bug Fixes**
* Improved input validation and error handling in CLI commands and
deployment scripts.
* Added explicit handling for zero address in operator strategy
retrieval.
* **Chores**
* Updated documentation and configuration templates for easier
onboarding and deployment management.
* Improved logging and output formatting for deployment and verification
processes.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Degosserie <723552+stiiifff@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Kaouk <56095276+ahmadkaouk@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary of changes
- We decided to remove the topics and nonce from the massage encoding
since we don't use them (original commit:
ee2a3f2fd4).
- Besides, we already have a nonce at the Snowbridge message level
f4ab5c2b2e/operator/primitives/snowbridge/inbound-queue/src/v2/message.rs (L105)
- I had to recreate the static test for _encoding_ (happens in
[DataHavenSnowbridgeMessages.sol](d12d40634f/contracts/src/libraries/DataHavenSnowbridgeMessages.sol)
) / _decoding_ (happens in
[operator/primitives/bridge/src/lib.rs)](f9f9cc65fe/operator/primitives/bridge/src/lib.rs).
Now it matches the current structure. The idea is that now we can test
that we don't break the decoding in followup refactoring.
- Fixes a problem with EigenLayer validator addresses. In all our
contracts we were using `bytes32` to refer to a Solochain validator
address. But on our Substrate change we actually expect AccountId20, so
only 20 bytes. This was causing the decoding to fail.
- I opted for the minimal change that would be to take the right-most 20
bytes to send that to our chain. But we might want aswell to limit our
EigenLayer contracts to be only 20 bytes long. @ahmadkaouk showcase this
[here](92a34c273c)
- Adds a bash script to run the static test. The test will compile the
contracts, run the encoding test, compile the operator, and run the
decoding test. This saves a huge amount of time since we don't need to
run the full e2e setup. The way of running it is the following:
```bash
cd operator/test/scripts
./test_message_encoding.sh
```
- As a consequence of this PR, the execution relayer now works properly.
EDIT:
> [!IMPORTANT]
**We decided to use 20-byte addresses in our contracts**. So what is
stated above is not valid anymore.
The change implies that the mapping from Ethereum addresses to bytes32
addresses now it's a mapping as follows:
dd3ba99ac0/contracts/src/DataHavenServiceManager.sol (L51-L52)
I've updated helper functions, tests, etc to be compliant with this
change. The execution relayer and beefy relayer look stable now.
---------
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Kaouk <ahmadkaouk.93@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Kaouk <56095276+ahmadkaouk@users.noreply.github.com>
In this PR:
1. Implement application-specific functionalities in the
`DataHavenServiceManager` contract:
1. Registering of 3 operator sets: Validators, BSPs and MSPs.
2. Allowlisted sign up of operators.
3. Integration with Snowbridge to send message of new validator set.
2. Basic testing of the above functionalities.
3. Tests now use less mocked contracts (especially from EigenLayer).
4. Refactor of `SignUpOperator` script, which now supports the three
kinds of Operator sets.
In this PR:
1. Implement deployment script for all contracts involved. This includes
1. EigenLayer core contracts.
2. Snowbridge contracts.
3. Our custom contracts to interact with both protocols.
4. Update README to document functionalities of `contracts` directory.
Future work:
1. Deployment of EigenLayer contracts should be conditional, as we
wouldn't deploy them in testnet or mainnet, but we would do it in an
internal stagenet.
5. Cleaning up unused smart contracts.
