So-called "Quote expressions" were added in b6ec2387b3
to support foreign syntax to be used in Angular templates, requiring a custom
template transform to convert them somehow during compilation. Support for template
transforms was originally implemented in a43ed79ee7 but
has since been dropped. Since the compiler is not public API the quote expressions
should not have any usages anymore. Removing support for them can improve error
reporting for expressions that contain a `:`, e.g. binding to a URL without quotes:
```html
<a [href]="http://google.com">Click me</a>
```
Here, `http` would be parsed as foreign "http" quote expression with `//google.com` as
value, later reporting the error "Quotes are not supported for evaluation!" because
there was no template transform to convert that code.
Closes#40398
PR Close#44915
Currently the compiler has three different classes to represent a "call to something":
1. `MethodCall` - `foo.bar()`
2. `SafeMethodCall` - `foo?.bar()`.
3. `FunctionCall` - Any calls that don't fit into the first two classes. E.g. `foo.bar()()`.
There are a few problems with this approach:
1. It is inconistent with the TypeScript AST which only has one node: `CallExpression`.
2. It means that we have to maintain more code, because the various parts of the compiler need to know about three node types.
3. It doesn't allow us to easily implement some new JS features like safe calls (e.g. `foo.bar?.())`).
These changes rework the compiler so that it produces only one node: `Call`. The new node behaves similarly to the TypeScript `CallExpression` whose `receiver` can be any expression.
There was a similar situation in the output AST where we had an `InvokeMethodExpression` and `InvokeFunctionExpression`. I've combined both of them into `InvokeFunctionExpression`.
PR Close#42882
Currently we support safe property (`a?.b`) and method (`a?.b()`) accesses, but we don't handle safe keyed reads (`a?.[0]`) which is inconsistent. These changes expand the compiler in order to support safe key read expressions as well.
PR Close#41911
Prior to this change, the unary + and - operators would be parsed as `x - 0`
and `0 - x` respectively. The runtime semantics of these expressions are
equivalent, however they may introduce inaccurate template type checking
errors as the literal type is lost, for example:
```ts
@Component({
template: `<button [disabled]="isAdjacent(-1)"></button>`
})
export class Example {
isAdjacent(direction: -1 | 1): boolean { return false; }
}
```
would incorrectly report a type-check error:
> error TS2345: Argument of type 'number' is not assignable to parameter
of type '-1 | 1'.
Additionally, the translated expression for the unary + operator would be
considered as arithmetic expression with an incompatible left-hand side:
> error TS2362: The left-hand side of an arithmetic operation must be of
type 'any', 'number', 'bigint' or an enum type.
To resolve this issues, the implicit transformation should be avoided.
This commit adds a new unary AST node to represent these expressions,
allowing for more accurate type-checking.
Fixes#20845Fixes#36178
PR Close#37918
