Since we generate a `.mjs` file as entry-point for jasmine tests,
a couple of issues prevented the transitive dependencies from
bootstrap targets to be brought in (causing resolution errors):
1. The `_files` (previously `_esm2015`) targets are no longer needed,
and they also miss all the information on runfiles.
2. The aspect for computing linker mappings does not respect the
`bootstrap` attribute from the `spec_entrypoint` so we manually
add the extract ESM output targets (this rule works with the aspect
and forwards linker mappings).
PR Close#48521
For every `ts_library` target we expose a shorthand that grants
access to the JS files because `DefaultInfo` of a ts library
only exposes the `.d.ts` files.
We rename this away from `es2015` since in practice it's a much
higher target these days. Additionally we no longer use the devmode
output but rather use the prodmode output which has the explicit
`.mjs` output- compatible with ESM.
PR Close#48521
This commit introduces the `provideHttpClientTesting()` function as an
alternative to the `HttpClientTestingModule` (in fact, the NgModule is
converted internally to just use the new provider function).
PR Close#47502
Speeds up the dev-turnaround by only bundling types when packaging. Currently
bundling occurs for all the `ng_module` targets in devmode.
This has various positive benefits:
* Avoidance of this rather slower operation in development
* Makes APF-built packages also handle types for `ts_library` targets consistently.
* Allows us to ensure APF entry-points have `d.ts` _always_ bundled (working with ESM
module resolution in TypeScript -- currently experimental)
* Allows us to remove the secondary `package.json` files from APF (maybe APF v14? - seems
low-impact). This would clean-up the APF even more and fix resolution issues (like in Vite)
PR Close#45405
When `HttpTestingController.verify` is used to verify that there are not open,
unexpected requests it would throw an error with the method and URL of all pending
requests, excluding the query parameters. This is confusing, as e.g. `expectOne`
matches a URL including its query parameters and `expectOne` does include the
query parameters when it reports when no request could be matched.
This commit changes the error that is reported by `verify` to include the query
parameters.
Closes#19974
PR Close#44917
To make our test output i.e. devmode output more aligned
with what we produce in the NPM packages, or to be more
aligned with what Angular applications will usually consume,
the devmode output is switched from ES5 to ES2015.
Additionally various tsconfigs (outside of Bazel) have been
updated to match with the other parts of the build. The rules
are:
ES2015 for test configurations, ES2020 for actual code that will
end up being shipped (this includes the IDE-only tsconfigs).
PR Close#44505
Currently the `HttpClient` always wraps errors from XHR requests, but
the underlying errors are always of type `ProgressEvent`, or don't have
a native error if the status code is just indicating failure (e.g. 404).
This behavior does not match in the `TestRequest` class provided by
`@angular/common/http/testing` where errors are considered being
of type `ErrorEvent`. This is incorrect because `ErrorEvent`s provide
information for errors in scripts or files which are evaluated. Since
the `HttpClient` never evaluates scripts/files, and also since XHR requests
clearly are documented to emit `ProgressEvent`'s, we should change the
`TestSupport` to retrieve such `ProgressEvent`'s instead of incompatible
objects of type `ErrorEvent`.
In favor of having a deprecation period, we keep supporting `ErrorEvent`
in the `TestRequest.error` signature. Eventually, we can remove this
signature in the future.
Resources:
* https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/XMLHttpRequest/error_event
* https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/ErrorEvent
* https://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/#event-xhr-errpr
Related to: https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/34748.
DEPRECATED: `TestRequest` from `@angular/common/http/testing` no longer
accepts `ErrorEvent` when simulating XHR errors. Instead instances of
`ProgressEvent` should be passed, matching with the native browser behavior.
PR Close#36082
We can remove all of the entry point resolution configuration from the package.json
in our source code as ng_package rule adds the properties automatically and correctly
configures them.
This change simplifies our code base but doesn't have any impact on the package.json
in the distributed npm_packages.
PR Close#36944
Fixes#18013
Previously it was hard to debug an `expectOne` if the request had no match, as the error message was:
Expected one matching request for criteria "Match URL: /some-url?query=hello", found none.
This commit adds a bit more info to the error, by listing the actual requests received:
Expected one matching request for criteria "Match URL: /some-url?query=hello", found none. Requests received are: POST /some-url?query=world.
PR Close#27005
The major one that affects the angular repo is the removal of the bootstrap attribute in nodejs_binary, nodejs_test and jasmine_node_test in favor of using templated_args --node_options=--require=/path/to/script. The side-effect of this is that the bootstrap script does not get the require.resolve patches with explicitly loading the targets _loader.js file.
PR Close#34736
The major one that affects the angular repo is the removal of the bootstrap attribute in nodejs_binary, nodejs_test and jasmine_node_test in favor of using templated_args --node_options=--require=/path/to/script. The side-effect of this is that the bootstrap script does not get the require.resolve patches with explicitly loading the targets _loader.js file.
PR Close#34589
Currently we only run Saucelabs on PRs using the legacy View Engine
build. Switching that build to Ivy is not trivial and there are various
options:
1. Updating the R3 switches to use POST_R3 by default. At first glance,
this doesn't look easy because the current ngtsc switch logic seems to
be unidirectional (only PRE_R3 to POST_R3).
2. Updating the legacy setup to run with Ivy. This sounds like the easiest
solution at first.. but it turns out to be way more complicated. Packages
would need to be built with ngtsc using legacy tools (i.e. first building
the compiler-cli; and then building packages) and View Engine only tests
would need to be determined and filtered out. Basically it will result in
re-auditing all test targets. This is contradictory to the fact that we have
this information in Bazel already.
3. Creating a new job that runs tests on Saucelabs with Bazel. We specify
fine-grained test targets that should run. This would be a good start
(e.g. acceptance tests) and also would mean that we do not continue maintaining
the legacy setup..
This commit implements the third option as it allows us to move forward
with the general Bazel migration. We don't want to spend too much time
on our legacy setup since it will be removed anyway in the future.
PR Close#34277
This is a breaking change in nodejs rules 0.40.0 as part of the API review & cleanup for the 1.0 release. Their APIs are identical as ts_web_test was just karma_web_test without the config_file attribute.
PR Close#33802
Since we build and publish the individual packages
using Bazel and `build.sh` has been removed, we can
safely remove the `rollup.config.js` files which are no
longer needed because the `ng_package` bazel rule
automatically handles the rollup settings and globals.
PR Close#28646
