The options to generate NgFactory and NgSummary files were added to Ivy for backwards compatibility with ViewEngine. Since ViewEngine was deprecated and removed, the NgFactory and NgSummary files are no longer used as well.
This commit drops obsolete options to generate NgFactory and NgSummary files. Also, the logic that generates those files is also removed.
PR Close#48268
The way the benchmarking code is used and wired up in g3 is rather
magical. This change makes it easier to sync into g3 by using
conditional blocks, and also consistnetly using a single bundle name
(like it was before— we regressed here as part of the ESM initial
changes- but now with clear comments, it's more future-proof..)
PR Close#48521
* Switches away from the ESM-incompatible & unmaintained `ts_devserver`
to `http_server`. This is the canonical server maintained by dev-infra
* Switches tests away from CommonJS specific logic. e.g. require.resolve
* Adjusts tests to work with Protractor spec bundling (Protractor does
not support ESM execution, but we want to take ESM-written specs)
* Reworks playground and benchmarks to use `app_bundle` and `esbuild`
instead of loading hundreds of files individually. This also makes
tests more stable and more aligned with real applications.
PR Close#48521
The dev-infra build tooling is now decoupled from `ng-dev`. This will
make it easier to update `ng-dev` without necessarily needing to upgrade
the whole build system, Bazel etc. This is useful when e.g. new release
tool features have been added and should also be ported to active LTS
branches.
PR Close#46976
This commit updates various places in the repo (mostly tests/examples) to drop all `.ngfactory` and `.ngsummary` imports as they are no longer needed in Ivy.
PR Close#44957
The `ng_rollup_bundle` rule has been replaced with a new rule called
`app_bundle`. This rule replicates the Angular v13 optimization
pipeline in the CLI, so that we can get better benchmarking results.
Also the rule is much simpler to maintain as it relies on ESbuild.
The old `ng_rollup_bundle` rule did rely on e.g. build-optimizer that no
longer has an effect on v13 Angular packages, so technically size
tests/symbol tests were no longer as correct as they were before. This
commit fixes that.
A couple of different changes and their explanation:
* Language-service will no longer use the benchmark rule for creating
its NPM bundles! It will use plain `rollup_bundle`. ESBuild would have
been nice but the language-service relies on AMD that ESBuild cannot
generate (yet?)
* Service-worker ngsw-worker.js file was generated using the benchmark
bundle rule. This is wrong. We will use a simple ESbuild rule in the
future. The output is more predictable that way, and we can have a
clear use of the benchmark bundle rule..
* A couple of benchmarks in `modules/` had to be updated to use e.g.
`initTableUtils` calls. This is done because with the new rule, all
files except for the entry-point are considered side-effect free. The
utilities for benchmarks relied on side-effects in some
transitively-loaded file (bad practice anyway IMO). We are now
initializing the utilities using a proper init function that is
exported...
PR Close#44490
Refactors the `ng_rollup_bundle` rule to a macro that relies on
the `@bazel/rollup` package. This means that the rule no longer
deals with custom ESM5 flavour output, but rather only builds
prodmode ES2015 output. This matches the common build output
in Angular projects, and optimizations done in CLI where
ES2015 is the default optimization input.
The motiviation for this change is:
* Not duplicating rollup Bazel rules. Instead leveraging the official
rollup rule.
* Not dealing with a third TS output flavor in Bazel.The ESM5 flavour has the
potential of slowing down local development (as it requires compilation replaying)
* Updating the rule to be aligned with current CLI optimizations.
This also _fixes_ a bug that surfaced in the old rollup bundle rule.
Code that is unused, is not removed properly. The new rule fixes this by
setting the `toplevel` flag. This instructs terser to remove unused
definitions at top-level. This matches the optimization applied in CLI
projects. Notably the CLI doesn't need this flag, as code is always
wrapped by Webpack. Hence, the unused code eliding runs by default.
PR Close#37623
Close#35157
In the current version of zone.js, zone.js uses it's own package format, and it is not following the rule
of Angualr package format(APF), so it is not easily to be consumed by Angular CLI or other bundle tools.
For example, zone.js npm package has two bundles,
1. zone.js/dist/zone.js, this is a `es5` bundle.
2. zone.js/dist/zone-evergreen.js, this is a `es2015` bundle.
And Angular CLI has to add some hard-coding code to handle this case, o5376a8b139/packages/schematics/angular/application/files/src/polyfills.ts.template (L55-L58)
This PR upgrade zone.js npm package format to follow APF rule, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CZC2rcpxffTDfRDs6p1cfbmKNLA6x5O-NtkJglDaBVs/edit#heading=h.k0mh3o8u5hx
The updated points are:
1. in package.json, update all bundle related properties
```
"main": "./bundles/zone.umd.js",
"module": "./fesm2015/zone.js",
"es2015": "./fesm2015/zone.js",
"fesm2015": "./fesm2015/zone.js",
```
2. re-organize dist folder, for example for `zone.js` bundle, now we have
```
dist/
bundles/
zone.js // this is the es5 bundle
fesm2015/
zone.js // this is the es2015 bundle (in the old version is `zone-evergreen.js`)
```
3. have several sub-packages.
1. `zone-testing`, provide zone-testing bundles include zone.js and testing libraries
2. `zone-node`, provide zone.js implemention for NodeJS
3. `zone-mix`, provide zone.js patches for both Browser and NodeJS
All those sub-packages will have their own `package.json` and the bundle will reference `bundles(es5)` and `fesm2015(es2015)`.
4. keep backward compatibility, still keep the `zone.js/dist` folder, and all bundles will be redirected to `zone.js/bundles` or `zone.js/fesm2015` folders.
PR Close#36540
* Move tools/brotli-cli, tools/browsers, tools/components,
tools/ng_rollup_bundle, and modules/e2e_util to dev-infra/benchmarking
* Fix imports and references to moved folders and files
* Set up BUILD.bazel files for moved folders so they can be packaged with
dev-infra's :npm_package
PR Close#36434
Currently, based on the file names it's not quite clear whether
a given `.spec.ts` file runs benchmark perf or benchmark e2e
functionality tests. To disambiguate these, we use new file
suffixs. i.e. `e2e-spec.ts` and `perf-spec.ts`.
PR Close#34753
