With the deprecation of the configurable errorHandler in the Router, there is a missing
use-case to prevent the navigation promise from rejecting on an error. This rejection
results in unhandled promise rejections. This commit allows developers to instruct
the router to instead resolve the navigation promise with 'false', which matches
the behavior of other failed navigations.
Resolving the Promise would be the ideal default behavior. It is rare
that any code handles the navigation Promise at all and even more rare
that the Promise rejection is caught. Updating the default value for
this option should be considered for an upcoming major version.
fixes#48902
PR Close#48910
The `RouterTestingHarness` should throw an error if the call to `navigateByUrl`
expects a component to be activated but the navigation failed.
fixes#52344
PR Close#52357
In order to test components and services which depend on router navigations, such as `ActivatedRoute` instances, tests currently need to provide a fair bit of boilerplate _or_ they can set up a stub for `ActivatedRoute` and list it in the `providers` to override it in `TestBed`. This approach of stubbing the `ActivatedRoute` creates a situation that can easily cause the test to break. The stub often only mocks out the dependencies that the component/service _currently_ needs. This dependencies might change over time and break the test in an unexpected way. In addition, it is difficult to get the structure of `ActivatedRoute` exactly correct.
This change will allow unit tests to quickly set up routes, trigger real navigations in the Router, and get instances of component's to test along with real instances of `ActivatedRoute`. This all comes without needing to know that the component depends on `ActivatedRoute` at all. This becomes more important when considering that a component may be refactored in the future to use `@Input` rather than access data on the `ActivatedRoute` instance (see #18967). Tests which mock out `ActivatedRoute` would all break, but those which use `navigateForTest` would continue to work without needing any updates.
resolves#15779resolves#48608
PR Close#48552
