A lot of our tests are wrapped in `{}` which serves no purpose, aside from increasing the nesting level and, in some cases, causing confusion. The braces appear to be a leftover from a time when all tests were wrapped in a `function main() {}`. The function declaration was removed in #21053, but the braces remained, presumably because it was easier to search&replace for `function main()`, but not to remove the braces at the same time.
PR Close#52239
Non typed forms allow to pass null to nested groups when calling `formGroup.reset()`, this commit prevent an undefined access.
fixes#20509
PR Close#48830
The `Writable` type is usefull when we want overwrite readonly properties and we still want to maintain code navigation/reference. It should be use instead of `any` type assertions for example.
PR Close#49754
Currently internally Angular has some customized tsconfig files, because we don't align with the tsconfig of the rest of g3. These changes enable `noImplicitReturns` and `noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature` to align better with the internal config.
PR Close#51728
Previously, this PR cleaned up a bug introduced by #48679. However, since that PR needed to be rolled back, this PR now just checks in the test, to prevent that issue from re-occurring in the future.
PR Close#49693
`setDisabledState` is supposed to be called whenever the disabled state of a control changes, including upon control creation. However, a longstanding bug caused the method to not fire when an *enabled* control was attached. This bug was fixed in v15.
This had a side effect: previously, it was possible to instantiate a reactive form control with `[attr.disabled]=true`, even though the the corresponding control was enabled in the model. (Note that the similar-looking property binding version `[disabled]=true` was always rejected, though.) This resulted in a mismatch between the model and the DOM. Now, because `setDisabledState` is always called, the value in the DOM will be immediately overwritten with the "correct" enabled value.
Users should instead disable the control directly in their model. (There are many ways to do this, such as using the `{value: 'foo', disabled: true}` constructor format, or immediately calling `FooControl.disable()` in `ngOnInit`.)
If this incompatibility is too breaking, you may also opt out using `FormsModule.withConfig` or `ReactiveFormsModule.withConfig` at the time you import it, via the `callSetDisabledState` option.
However, there is an exceptional case: radio buttons. Because Reactive Forms models the entire group of radio buttons as a single `FormControl`, there is no way to control the disabled state for individual radios, so they can no longer be configured as disabled.
In this PR, we have special cased radio buttons to ignore their first call to `setDisabledState` when in `callSetDisabledState: 'always'` mode. This preserves the old behavior.
PR Close#48864
Jasmine has deprecated the `expectationFailOutput` argument and replaced it by the `withContext()` method
Also removing all references to #24571 from the forms unit tests as the non null assertions are fine in the context.
PR Close#48894
Tests now always run with ESM 2020, while previously they ran with
ES2015 CommonJS UMD bundles.
Since ZoneJS does not support intercepting native `async/await` syntax,
the forms test needs to use the zone-compatible variant of
`jasmine_node_tests`. This variant downlevels the native `async/await`
syntax to generators that ZoneJS can intercept. All of this is done
using the dev-infra ESBuild `spec_bundle` rule.
PR Close#48521
Since we generate a `.mjs` file as entry-point for jasmine tests,
a couple of issues prevented the transitive dependencies from
bootstrap targets to be brought in (causing resolution errors):
1. The `_files` (previously `_esm2015`) targets are no longer needed,
and they also miss all the information on runfiles.
2. The aspect for computing linker mappings does not respect the
`bootstrap` attribute from the `spec_entrypoint` so we manually
add the extract ESM output targets (this rule works with the aspect
and forwards linker mappings).
PR Close#48521
For every `ts_library` target we expose a shorthand that grants
access to the JS files because `DefaultInfo` of a ts library
only exposes the `.d.ts` files.
We rename this away from `es2015` since in practice it's a much
higher target these days. Additionally we no longer use the devmode
output but rather use the prodmode output which has the explicit
`.mjs` output- compatible with ESM.
PR Close#48521
Fixes that the `AbstractControl` was mutating the validators arrays being passed into the constructor an helper methods like `setValidators`.
Fixes#47827.
PR Close#47830
[A Github issue](https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/43821) about an arcane-sounding Forms error is one of the repo's top-ten most visited pages. This converts the error to `RuntimeErrorCode` and adds a dedicated guide to explain how to solve it.
PR Close#47969
Fixes that the `AbstractControl` was mutating the validators arrays being passed into the constructor an helper methods like `setValidators`.
Fixes#47827.
PR Close#47830
Previously, `setDisabledState` was never called when attached if the control is enabled. This PR fixes the bug, and creates a configuration option to opt-out of the fix.
Fixes#35309.
BREAKING CHANGE: setDisabledState will always be called when a `ControlValueAccessor` is attached. You can opt-out with `FormsModule.withConfig` or `ReactiveFormsModule.withConfig`.
PR Close#47576
The forms `submit` event handlers have a `return false` to prevent form submissions from reloading the page, however this also prevents the browser behavior for forms with `method="dialog"`.
These changes add an exception since the `method="dialog"` doesn't refresh the page.
Fixes#47150.
PR Close#47308
Type inference in cases involving `ControlConfig` was previously not working as desired. This was because the compiler was enforcing that `ControlConfig` is a *tuple* -- which is not always that easy to prove! By relaxing this constraint a bit, and just inferring from `ControlConfig` as an array, the type inference catches many more cases, and is generally more correct.
PR Close#47034
The new `FormRecord` entity introduced in Angular v14 does not have its builder method.
This commit adds it, allowing to write:
```
const fb = new FormBuilder();
fb.record({ a: 'one' });
```
This works for both the `FormBuilder` and the `NonNullableFormBuilder`
PR Close#46485
Replace `new Error()` in a forms Validators function with `RuntimeError`, for better tree-shakability. Also, improve the error messages, and add documentation.
PR Close#46537
Consider the case in which `FormBuilder` is used to construct a group with an optional field:
```
const controls = { name: fb.control('') };
const foo: FormGroup<{
name: FormControl<string | null>;
address?: FormControl<string | null>;
}> = fb.group<{
name: FormControl<string | null>;
address?: FormControl<string | null>;
}>(controls);
```
Today, with fully strict TypeScript settings, the above will not compile:
```
Types of property 'controls' are incompatible.
Type '{ name: FormControl<string | null>; address?: FormControl<FormGroup<SubFormControls> | null | undefined> | undefined; }' is not assignable to type '{ name: FormControl<string | null>; address?: FormGroup<SubFormControls> | undefined; }'.
```
Notice that the `fb.group(...)` is calculating the following type for address: `address?: FormControl<FormGroup<string|null>`. This is clearly wrong -- an extraneous `FormControl` has been added!
This is coming from the calculation of the result type of `fb.group(...)`. In the type definition, if we cannot detect the outer control type, [we assume it's just an unwrapped value, and automatically wrap it in `FormControl`](https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/14.0.0/packages/forms/src/form_builder.ts#L66).
Because the optional `{address?: FormControl<string|null>}` implicitly makes the RHS have type `FormControl<string|null>|undefined`, [the relevant condition is not satisfied](https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/14.0.0/packages/forms/src/form_builder.ts#L55). In particular, the condition expects just `FormGroup<T>`, not `FormGroup<T>|undefined`. So we assume `T` is a value type, and it gets wrapped with `FormControl`.
The solution is to add the cases where `undefined` is included in the union type when detecting which control `T` is (if any).
PR Close#46253
DEPRECATED:
The `initialValueIsDefault` option has been deprecated and replaced with the otherwise-identical `nonNullable` option, for the sake of naming consistency.
Previously, using `FormBuilder` with a union type would produce unions of *controls*:
```
// `foo` has type `FormControl<string>|FormControl<number>`.
const c = fb.nonNullable.group({foo: 'bar' as string | number});
```
This actually works in many cases, due to how extraordinarily powerful Typescript's distributive types are (e.g. `value` still has type `string|number`), but it is subtly incorrect. Here is a code example that exposes the reason the inference is incorrect. It exploits the fact that Typescript will not "un-distribute" a type, producing an obviously spurious error:
```
// fc gets an inferred distributive union type `FormControl<string> | FormControl<number>`
let fc = c.controls.foo;
// Error: Type 'FormControl<string | number>' is not assignable to type 'FormControl<string> | FormControl<number>'.
fc = new FormControl<string|number>('', {initialValueIsDefault: true});
```
Instead, we want the union to apply to the *values*:
```
// `foo` should have type `FormControl<string|number>`.
const c = fb.nonNullable.group({foo: 'bar' as string | number});
```
Essentially, we want to prevent Typescript from distributing the type. [As specified in the handbook](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/2/conditional-types.html#distributive-conditional-types):
> Typically, distributivity is the desired behavior. To avoid that behavior, you can surround each side of the extends keyword with square brackets.
This PR applies this suggestion to `FormBuilder`'s type inference.
Fixes#45912.
PR Close#45942
Based on early feedback, calling `fb.nonNullable.group(...)` continues to be clunky for a form with many such groups. Allowing `NonNullableFormBuilder` to be directly injected enables the following:
```
constructor(private fb: NonNullableFormBuilder) {}
```
PR Close#45904
With typed forms, all `FormControl`s are nullable by default, because they can be reset to `null`. This behavior is possible to change by passing the option `initialValueIsDefault: true`. However, in a large form, this is extremely cumbersome, as the option must be repeated over and over. Additionally, it is not possible to take full advantage of `FormBuilder`, since `FormBuilder.group` and `FormBuilder.array` will produce nullable controls.
This PR introduces a new accessor `FormBuilder.nonNullable`, which produces *non-nullable* controls. Specifically, any call to `.control` will produce controls with `{initialValueIsDefault: true}`, and calls to `.array` or `.group` that implicitly build inner controls will have the same effect.
```ts
let nfb = new FormBuilder().nonNullable;
let name = nfb.group({who: 'Alex'}); // FormGroup<{who: FormControl<string>}>
name.reset();
console.log(name); // {who: 'Alex'}
```
PR Close#45852
Previously, the following code would fail to compile:
```
let form: FormGroup<{email: FormControl<string | null>}>;
form = fb.group({
email: ['', Validators.required]
});
```
This is because the compiler was unable to properly infer the inner type of `ControlConfig` arrays in some cases. The same issue applies to `FormArray` as well under certain circumstances.
This change cleans up the `FormBuilder` type signatures to always use the explicit Element type, and to catch `ControlConfig` types that might fall through.
PR Close#45684
As part of the typed forms RFC, we proposed the creation of a new FormRecord type, to support dynamic groups with homogenous values. This PR introduces FormRecord, as a subclass of FormGroup.
PR Close#45607
This PR strongly types the forms package by adding generics to AbstractControl classes as well as FormBuilder. This makes forms type-safe and null-safe, for both controls and values.
The design uses a "control-types" approach. In other words, the type parameter on FormGroup is an object containing controls, and the type parameter on FormArray is an array of controls.
Special thanks to Alex Rickabaugh and Andrew Kushnir for co-design & implementation, to Sonu Kapoor and Netanel Basal for illustrative prior art, and to Cédric Exbrayat for extensive testing and validation.
BREAKING CHANGE: Forms classes accept a generic.
Forms model classes now accept a generic type parameter. Untyped versions of these classes are available to opt-out of the new, stricter behavior.
PR Close#43834
Fixes a long-standing issue where swapping out the `FormGroup` and calling `disable` immediately afterwards doesn't actually disable the `ControlValueAccessor`.
Fixes#22556.
PR Close#43499
There was a subtle bug involving the opt-out class for FormBuilder, which I discovered during the ongoing migration. The types must be structurally the same, because people pass around FormBuilders, in addition to passing around the controls they produce. This PR ensures FormBuilder and UntypedFormBuilder are assignable to each other.
PR Close#45421
Close#44724
`DebugNode.triggerEventHandler()` should accept the `eventObj` as an
optional parameter. So the user don't have to write code like
```
elem.triggerEventHandler('click', null);
```
PR Close#45279
When an `NgModel` is created within a `form`, it receives an `NgControl` based on its `name`, but
the control doesn't get swapped out if the name changes. This can lead to problems if the `NgModel`
is part of an `ngFor`, because the name can change based on its position in the list and a new
control can be defined with the same name, leading us to having multiple directives pointing to
the same control. For example, if we start off with a list like :
```
[0, 1, 2]; -> [NgModel(0), NgModel(1), NgModel(2)]
```
Then we remove the second item:
```
[0, 2]; -> [NgModel(0), NgModel(2)]
```
And finally, if we decide to add an item to the end of the list, we'll already have a control for
index 2, causing the list to look like:
```
[0, 2, 3]; -> [NgModel(0), NgModel(2), NgModel(2)]
```
These changes fix the issue by removing the old control when the `name` of the directive changes.
Fixes#38465.
Fixes#37920.
PR Close#40459
Form required validator should not reject objects that contain a length attribute set to zero.
Fixes#30718.
Co-authored-by: Dylan Hunn <dylhunn@gmail.com>
BREAKING CHANGE: objects with a length key set to zero will no longer validate as empty.
This is technically a breaking change, since objects with a key `length` and value `0` will no longer validate as empty. This is a very minor change, and any reliance on this behavior is probably a bug anyway.
PR Close#33729
This implementation change was originally proposed as part of Typed Forms, and will have major consequences for that project as described in the design doc. Submitting it separately will greatly simplify the risk of landing Typed Forms. This change should have no visible impact on normal users of FormControl.
See the Typed Forms design doc here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cWuBE-oo5WLtwkLFxbNTiaVQGNk8ipgbekZcKBeyxxo.
PR Close#44316
PR Close#44806
Currently, `ngModel` calls` setValue` after the `resolvedPromise` is resolved.
The promise is resolved _after_ the child template executes. The change detection
is run but `OnPush` views are not updated because they are not marked as dirty.
PR Close#44886
This new feature allows negative indices to wrap around from the back, just like ES2021 `Array.at`. In particular, the following methods accept negative indices, and behave like corresponding Array methods:
* `FormArray.at(index)`: behaves the same as `Array.at(index)`
* `FormArray.insert(index, control)`: behaves the same as `Array.splice(index, 0, control)`
* `FormArray.setControl(index, control)`: behaves the same as `Array.splice(index, 1, control)`
* `FormArray.removeAt(index, control)`: behaves the same as `Array.splice(index, 1)`
Previous work in #44746 and #44631 (by @amitbeck).
Issue #44642.
Co-authored-by: Amit Beckenstein <amitbeck@gmail.com>
PR Close#44848
Modified required validator and checkbox validator to inherit abstractValidator.
For every validato type different PR will be raised as discussed in #42378.
Closes#42267
PR Close#44162
This implementation change was originally proposed as part of Typed Forms, and will have major consequences for that project as described in the design doc. Submitting it separately will greatly simplify the risk of landing Typed Forms. This change should have no visible impact on normal users of FormControl.
See the Typed Forms design doc here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cWuBE-oo5WLtwkLFxbNTiaVQGNk8ipgbekZcKBeyxxo.
PR Close#44316
This commit performs some refactoring of the AbstractControl-based classes to employ shared `RuntimeError` class and also updates the code to avoid duplication and improve minification.
PR Close#44398
To make our test output i.e. devmode output more aligned
with what we produce in the NPM packages, or to be more
aligned with what Angular applications will usually consume,
the devmode output is switched from ES5 to ES2015.
Additionally various tsconfigs (outside of Bazel) have been
updated to match with the other parts of the build. The rules
are:
ES2015 for test configurations, ES2020 for actual code that will
end up being shipped (this includes the IDE-only tsconfigs).
PR Close#44505
Make the following fixes:
* When submitting the entire migration in a disabled state, I commented out more code than strictly required
* Responding to some final review comments caused two conditions to become flipped
* Always use explicit checks instead of boolean corecion
* Fix one missed any cast in a test case
PR Close#44540
Allow a FormControl to be reset to its initial value. Provide this feature via a new option in a FormControlOptions interface, based on AbstractControlOptions.
Also, expose the default value as part of the public API. This is part of a feature that has been requested elsewhere (e.g. in #19747).
This was originally proposed as part of typed forms. As discussed in the GDE session (and after with akushnir/alxhub), it is likely better to just reuse the initial value rather than accepting an additional default.
It is desirable to land this separately in order to reduce the scope of the typed forms PR, and make it a types-only change.
Pertains to issue #13721.
PR Close#44434
It is possible to pass arguments to `FormBuilder` using four different formats: value-only, boxed value, control config, and value-array. Currently, these different methods are not well-tested, especially as they interact. This PR will add tests for the variety of different argument shapes.
This was originally inspired by typed forms: when `FormBuilder` becomes typed, all these argument shapes should just work, with correct inferred types.
PR Close#44452
Currently, many of our unit tests are written to use heterogenous groups and arrays, and controls that accept heterogenous values. This PR will make the minimum possible alterations to prepare those usages, mainly by annotating them as untyped controls, etc.
This PR is *not* intended to test typed forms, merely to minimize the size of the upcoming PR. This will allow that PR to be focused on the actual features and tests, rather than boilerplate fixes.
PR Close#44451
This reverts commit cdf50ff931.
Reverting as this needs a little more work on the documentation side, plus
the `export declare interface` syntax in `model.ts` might have unintended
side effects in g3.
This implementation change was originally proposed as part of Typed Forms, and will have major consequences for that project as described in the design doc. Submitting it separately will greatly simplify the risk of landing Typed Forms. This change should have no visible impact on normal users of FormControl.
See the Typed Forms design doc here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cWuBE-oo5WLtwkLFxbNTiaVQGNk8ipgbekZcKBeyxxo.
PR Close#44316
This commit updates the code of the `SelectMultipleControlValueAccessor` to:
- improve typings to make them more precise
- updates the note that refers to IE, but we still can not remove the branch since it's needed for Universal (that uses Domino)
PR Close#44261
This commit updates the logic of the `min` and `max` validators to allow
disabling them dynamically in case `null` is provided as a value. For example: `<input
type="number" [min]="minValue">`, when `minValue` might be set to `null` in a
component class. This should allow `min` and `max` validators to be used for dynamic forms.
Note: similar support was added to the `minLength` and `maxLength`
validators earlier (see #42565).
PR Close#42978
Several new functionalities are possible with this change: the most requested is that callers can now check whether a control has a required validator. Other uses include incrementally changing the validators set without doing an expensive operation to reset all validators.
Closes#13461.
PR Close#42838
If the validator is bound to be `null` then no validation occurs and
attribute is not added to DOM.
For every validator type different PR will be raised as discussed in
https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/42378.
Closes#42267.
PR Close#42565
When a FormControl, FormArray, or FormGroup is first constructed, if an async validator is attached, the `statusChanges` observable should receive a message when the validator complete (i.e. pending -> valid/invalid). If the validator was provided as part of the constructor options, it was not fired at construction time, which is fixed in this PR.
Fixes#35309.
PR Close#42553
As previously discussed in pull/31070 and issues/30486, this would be useful because it is often desirable to apply styles to fields that are both `ng-invalid` and `ng-pristine` after the first attempt at form submission, but Angular does not provide any simple way to do this (although evidently Angularjs did). This will now be possible with a descendant selector such as `.ng-submitted .ng-invalid`.
In this implementation, the directive that sets control status classes on forms and formGroups has its set of statuses widened to include `ng-submitted`. Then, in the event that `is('submitted')` is invoked, the `submitted` property of the control container is returned iff it exists. This is preferred over checking whether the container is a `Form` or `FormGroup` directly to avoid reflecting on those classes.
Closes#30486.
PR Close#42132.
This reverts commit 00b1444d12, undoing the rollback of this change.
PR Close#42132
Switches the repository to TypeScript 4.3 and the latest
version of tslib. This involves updating the peer dependency
ranges on `typescript` for the compiler CLI and for the Bazel
package. Tests for new TypeScript features have been added to
ensure compatibility with Angular's ngtsc compiler.
PR Close#42022
As previously discussed in pull/31070 and issues/30486, this would be useful because it is often desirable to apply styles to fields that are both `ng-invalid` and `ng-pristine` after the first attempt at form submission, but Angular does not provide any simple way to do this (although evidently Angularjs did). This will now be possible with a descendant selector such as `.ng-submitted .ng-invalid`.
In this implementation, the directive that sets control status classes on forms and formGroups has its set of statuses widened to include `ng-submitted`. Then, in the event that `is('submitted')` is invoked, the `submitted` property of the control container is returned iff it exists. This is preferred over checking whether the container is a `Form` or `FormGroup` directly to avoid reflecting on those classes.
Closes#30486.
PR Close#42132
Prior to this change the `min` and `max` validator directives would not
set the `min` and `max` attributes on the host element. The problem was
caused by the truthy check in host binding expression that was
calculated as `false` when `0` is used as a value. This commit updates
the logic to leverage nullish coalescing operator in these host binding
expressions, so `0` is treated as a valid value, thus the `min` and
`max` attributes are set correctly.
Partially closes#42267
PR Close#42412
We have some internal proxies for all of the Jasmine functions, as well as some other helpers. This code hasn't been touched in more than 5 years, it can lead to confusion and it isn't really necessary since the same can be achieved using Jasmine.
These changes remove most of the code and clean up our existing unit tests.
PR Close#42177
The Validator and AsyncValidator interfaces provide a callback, `registerOnValidatorChange(fn)`. `registerOnValidatorChange` is supposed to be fired at least once to register `fn` with the validator. `fn` is then called by the validator whenever its inputs change. This was previously not happening for FormGroup validators, and is now fixed.
PR Close#41971
Currently the code in the `FormGroupDirective` assumes that the shape of the underlying `FormGroup` never
changes and `FormControl`s are not replaced with other types. In practice this is possible and Forms code
should be able to process such changes in FormGroup shape.
This commit adds extra check to the `FormGroupDirective` class to avoid applying FormControl-specific to
other types.
Fixes#13788.
PR Close#40829
This commit adds the `emitEvent` option to the following FormArray and FormGroup methods:
* FormGroup.addControl
* FormGroup.removeControl
* FormGroup.setControl
* FormArray.push
* FormArray.insert
* FormArray.removeAt
* FormArray.setControl
* FormArray.clear
This option can be used to prevent an event from being emitted when adding or removing controls.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `emitEvent` option was added to the following `FormArray` and `FormGroup` methods:
* FormGroup.addControl
* FormGroup.removeControl
* FormGroup.setControl
* FormArray.push
* FormArray.insert
* FormArray.removeAt
* FormArray.setControl
* FormArray.clear
If your app has custom classes that extend `FormArray` or `FormGroup` classes and override the
above-mentioned methods, you may need to update your implementation to take the new options into
account and make sure that overrides are compatible from a types perspective.
Closes#29662.
PR Close#31031
This commit adds the missing `min` and `max` validators.
BREAKING CHANGE:
Previously `min` and `max` attributes defined on the `<input type="number">`
were ignored by Forms module. Now presence of these attributes would
trigger min/max validation logic (in case `formControl`, `formControlName`
or `ngModel` directives are also present on a given input) and
corresponding form control status would reflect that.
Fixes#16352
PR Close#39063
Prior to this commit, the `patchValue()` of the `FormGroup` and `FormArray` classes used to throw an exception
when the `value` argument contained a data structure that has `null` or `undefined` as a value for a field
that represents an instance of `FormGroup` or `FormArray` (for `FormControl` it's not a problem, since it
doesn't have nested controls), since the `patchValue()` method tried to iterate over provided values to
match current data structure.
This commit updates the `patchValue()` logic in `FormGroup` and `FormArray` classes to just ignore `null` and
`undefined` values (without any changes to corresponding `FormGroup` and `FormArray` instances). This
behavior looks inline with the `patchValue()` method goal of "doing its best to match the values to the
correct controls" (quote from docs).
Fixes#36672.
Fixes#21021.
PR Close#40534
PR #39235 introduced additional cleanup logic for form controls and directives. The cleanup logic relies
on the presence of ControlValueAccessor instances on FormControlName and FormControl directives. In general
these fields are present and there are also checks to make sure that the mentioned directive instances are
created with CVAs. However some scenarios (primarily tests) may invoke the logic in a way that the directive
instance would not be fully initialized, thus causing CVA to be absent. As a result, the cleanup logic fails
while trying to call some methods on associated CVA instances.
This commit updates the cleanup logic to take into account the situation when CVA is not present.
Fixes#40521.
PR Close#40526
When a form is reset, it goes through `_forEachChild` to call `reset` on each of its children.
The problem is that if a control is removed while the loop is running (e.g. by a subscription),
the form will throw an error, because it built up the list of available control before the loop
started.
These changes fix the issue by adding a null check before invoing the callback.
Fixes#33401.
PR Close#40462
The `NgControlStatusGroup` directive is shared between template-driven and reactive form modules. In cases when
only reactive forms module is present, the `NgControlStatusGroup` directive is still activated on all `<form>`
elements, but if there is no other reactive directive applied (such as `formGroup`), corresponding `ControlContainer`
token is missing, thus causing exceptions (since `NgControlStatusGroup` directive relies on it to determine the
status). This commit updates the logic to handle the case when no `ControlContainer` is present (effectively making
directive logic a noop in this case).
Alternative approach (more risky) worth considering in the future is to split the `NgControlStatusGroup` into
2 directives with different set of selectors and include them into template-driven and reactive modules separately.
The downside is that these directives might be activated simultaneously on the same element (e.g. `<form>`),
effectively doing the work twice.
Resolves#38391.
PR Close#40344
Prior to this commit, removing `FormControlDirective` and `FormGroupName` directive instances didn't clear
the callbacks previously registered on FromControl/FormGroup class instances. As a result, these callbacks
were executed even after `FormControlDirective` and `FormGroupName` directive instances were destroyed. That was
also causing memory leaks since these callbacks also retained references to DOM elements.
This commit updates the cleanup logic to take care of properly detaching FormControl/FormGroup/FormArray instances
from the view by removing view-specific callback at destroy time.
Closes#20007, #37431, #39590.
PR Close#39235
The value of a `FormControl` is treated in a special way (called boxed values) when it's an object with exactly
2 fields: `value` and `disabled`. This commit adds a test which verifies that an object is not treated as a boxed
value when `disabled` field is present, but `value` is missing.
PR Close#39801
Currently when an instance of the `FormControlName` directive is destroyed, the Forms package invokes
the `cleanUpControl` to clear all directive-specific logic (such as validators, onChange handlers,
etc) from a bound control. The logic of the `cleanUpControl` function should revert all setup
performed by the `setUpControl` function. However the `cleanUpControl` is too aggressive and removes
all callbacks related to the onChange and disabled state handling. This is causing problems when
a form control is bound to multiple FormControlName` directives, causing other instances of that
directive to stop working correctly when the first one is destroyed.
This commit updates the cleanup logic to only remove callbacks added while setting up a control
for a given directive instance.
The fix is needed to allow adding `cleanUpControl` function to other places where cleanup is needed
(missing this function calls in some other places causes memory leak issues).
PR Close#39623
Prior to this commit, the `cleanUpControl` function (responsible for cleaning up control instance)
was not taking validators into account. As a result, these validators remain registered on a detached
form control instance, thus causing memory leaks. This commit updates the `cleanUpControl` function
logic to also run validators cleanup.
As a part of this change, the logic to setup and cleanup validators was refactored and moved to
separate functions (with completely opposite behavior), so that they can be reused in the future.
This commit doesn't add the `cleanUpControl` calls to all possible places, it just fixes the cases
where this function is being called, but doesn't fully perform a cleanup. The `cleanUpControl`
function calls will be added to other parts of code (to avoid more memory leaks) in a followup PR.
PR Close#39234
This commit refactors validators-related logic that is common across most of the directives.
A couple notes on this refactoring:
* common logic was moved to the `AbstractControlDirective` class (including `validator` and
`asyncValidator` getters)
* sync/async validators are now composed in `AbstractControlDirective` class eagerly when validators
are set with `_setValidators` and `_setAsyncValidators` calls and the result is stored in directive
instance (thus getters return cached versions of validator fn). This is needed to make sure composed
validator function remains the same (retains its identity) for a given directive instance, so that
this function can be added and later removed from an instance of an AbstractControl-based class
(like `FormControl`). Preserving validator function is required to perform proper cleanup (in followup
PRs) of the AbstractControl-based classes when a directive is destroyed.
PR Close#38280
Prior to this change, the `validators` and `asyncValidators` fields of a few Forms directives
were typed as `any[]`. This commit updates the types and makes them consistent for all directives
in the Forms package.
BREAKING CHANGE:
Directives in the `@angular/forms` package used to have `any[]` as a type of `validators` and
`asyncValidators` arguments in constructors. Now these arguments are properly typed, so if your
code relies on directive constructor types it may require some updates to improve type safety.
PR Close#38944
This commit ensures that the `updateValueAndValidity` method takes the
`asyncValidator` into consideration to emit on the `statusChanges` observables.
This is necessary so that any subsequent changes are emitted properly to any
subscribers.
Closes#20424Closes#14542
BREAKING CHANGE:
Previously if FormControl, FormGroup and FormArray class instances had async validators
defined at initialization time, the status change event was not emitted once async validator
completed. After this change the status event is emitted into the `statusChanges` observable.
If your code relies on the old behavior, you can filter/ignore this additional status change
event.
PR Close#38354
This commit performs minor refactoring in Forms package to get rid of duplicate functions.
It looks like the functions were duplicated due to a slightly different type signatures, but
their logic is completely identical. The logic in retained functions remains the same and now
these function also accept a generic type to achieve the same level of type safety.
PR Close#38371
A util file is added to forms test package:
- it exposes simpleAsyncValidator, asyncValidator and asyncValidatorReturningObservable validators
- it refactors simpleAsyncValidator and asyncValidator to use common promise creation code
- it exposes currentStateOf allowing to get the validation state of a list of AbstractControl
Closes#37831
PR Close#38020
This commit refactors the way we store validators in AbstractControl-based classes:
in addition to the combined validators function that we have, we also store the original list of validators.
This is needed to have an ability to clean them up later at destroy time (currently it's problematic since
they are combined in a single function).
The change preserves backwards compatibility by making sure public APIs stay the same.
The only public API update is the change to the `AbstractControl` class constructor to extend the set
of possible types that it can accept and process (which should not be breaking).
PR Close#37881
Previously, `registerOnChange` used `hasOwnProperty` to identify if the
property is supported. However, this does not work as the `selectedOptions`
property is an inherited property. This commit fixes this by verifying
the property on the prototype instead.
Closes#37433
PR Close#37620
introduce a boolean to track form groups/arrays own pending async validation to distinguish between pending state due to children and pending state due to own validation
Fixes#10064
PR Close#22575
Prior to this commit, number input fields would to fire valueChanges twice: once for `input` events when typing and second for the `change` event when the field lost focus (both events happen at once when using the increment and decrement buttons on the number field).
Fixes#12540
BREAKING CHANGE: Number inputs no longer listen to the `change` event.
* Tests which trigger `change` events need to be updated to trigger `input` events instead.
* The `change` event was in place to support IE9, as we found that `input` events were not fired with backspace or cut actions. If you need to maintain IE9 support, you will need to add a change event listener to number inputs and call the `onChange` method of `NumberValueAccessor` manually.
* Lastly, old versions of WebDriver would synthetically trigger the `change` event on `WebElement.clear` and `WebElement.sendKeys`. If you are using an old version of WebDriver, you may need to update tests to ensure `input` events are triggered. For example, you could use `element.sendKeys(Keys.chord(Keys.CONTROL, "a"), Keys.BACK_SPACE);` in place of `element.clear()`.
PR Close#12540
PR Close#36087
Previously, the behavior of the `minLength` and `maxLength` validators
caused confusion, as they appeared to work with numeric values but
did not in fact produce consistent results. This commit fixes the issue
by skipping validation altogether when a numeric value is used.
BREAKING CHANGES:
* The `minLength` and `maxLength` validators now verify that a value has
numeric `length` property and invoke validation only if that's the case.
Previously, falsey values without the length property (such as `0` or
`false` values) were triggering validation errors. If your code relies on
the old behavior, you can include other validators such as [min][1] or
[requiredTrue][2] to the list of validators for a particular field.
[1]: https://angular.io/api/forms/Validators#min
[2]: https://angular.io/api/forms/Validators#requiredTrueCloses#35591
PR Close#36157
