`TemplateDefinitionBuilder` is the legacy template compiler, and was replaced by Template Pipeline as the default in v17.3.
This PR attempts to delete `TemplateDefinitionBuilder`, `ExpressionConverter`, and various helpers (i18n context, style builder, property visitors, etc).
Consider this a first pass: a lot of code has not yet been deleted (e.g. old TDB-specific test cases), and I'm sure I have missed additional helper code.
PR Close#54757
Currently we are unsafely unquoting CSS values which in some cases causes valid values to become invalid and invalid values to become valid.
Example:
```html
<div style="width:"1px;""></div>
```
In the above case, `width` has an invalid value of `"1px"`, however the compiler will transform it to `1px` which makes it valid.
On the other hand, in the below case
```html
<div style="content:"foo""></div>
```
`content` has a valid value of `"foo"`, but since the compiler unwraps it to `foo` it becomes invalid. For correctness, we should not remove quotes.
```js
const div = document.createElement('div');
div.style.width='"1px"';
div.style.content='foo';
div.style.width; // ''
div.style.content; // ''
div.style.width='1px';
div.style.content='"foo"';
div.style.width; // '1px'
div.style.content; // '"foo"'
```
More information about values can be found https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#value-def-identifier
PR Close#49460
NOTE: This change must be reverted with previous deletes so that it code remains in build-able state.
This change deletes old styling code and replaces it with a simplified styling algorithm.
The mental model for the new algorithm is:
- Create a linked list of styling bindings in the order of priority. All styling bindings ere executed in compiled order and than a linked list of bindings is created in priority order.
- Flush the style bindings at the end of `advance()` instruction. This implies that there are two flush events. One at the end of template `advance` instruction in the template. Second one at the end of `hostBindings` `advance` instruction when processing host bindings (if any).
- Each binding instructions effectively updates the string to represent the string at that location. Because most of the bindings are additive, this is a cheap strategy in most cases. In rare cases the strategy requires removing tokens from the styling up to this point. (We expect that to be rare case)S Because, the bindings are presorted in the order of priority, it is safe to resume the processing of the concatenated string from the last change binding.
PR Close#34616
