Instead of computing the bit input flags at compile-time and inling
the final bit flag number, we will use the `InputFlags` enum directly.
This is a little more code in the compiler side, but will allow us to
have better debuggable development code, and also prevents problems
where runtime flag bitmasks differ from the compiler flag bitmasks.
This is in practice a noop for optimized applications as the enum values
would be inlined anyway. This matches existing compiler emit for e.g.
change detection strategy, or view encapsulation enums.
PR Close#53571
The linker compliance tests were disabled with a Babel update and
nobody realized for quite a while, via
https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/49914.
As we've came across this lost coverage, which also is quite
impactful as all libraries depend on linked output- I've took initiative
to debug the root cause as there was no follow-up.
https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/51647.
It turned out to be a highly complex issue that is non-trivial to fix,
but at least we should try to resurrect the significant portion of test
coverage by still running the linker tests- avoiding regressions, or
unexpected issues (like with defer being developed). We can work on
re-enabling and fixing source-maps separately.
Tracked via https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/51647.
PR Close#53571
The linker compliance tests did not run for a while. There were a couple
of new tests that were not passing as this wasn't flagged on CI. This commit fixes this.
Fortunately there was no problematic code that did indicate issues with linking.
In the follow-up commit, we fix the compliance test infrastructure to
re-enable linker testing..
One clear issue is still that the defer blocks are not handled properly
in linked output- hence making defer not actually "lazy" for compiled
libraries. This needs to be handled separately by the framework team.
PR Close#53571
This commit adds a final test for input signals, integrating all major
parts:
* type-checking
* compiler detection
* compiler emit
* API signature tests
PR Close#53571
This commit introduces a new enum for capturing additional metadata
about inputs. Called `InputFlags`. These will be built up at compile
time and then propagated into the runtime logic, in a way that does
not require additional lookup dictionaries data structures, or
additional memory allocations for "common inputs" that do not have any flags.
The flags will incorporate information on whether an input is signal
based. This can then be used to avoid megamorphic accesses when such
input is set- as we'd not need to check the input field value. This also
avoids cases where an input signal may be used as initial value for an
input (as we'd not incorrectly detect the input as a signal input then).
The new metadata emit will be useful for incorporating additional
metadata for inputs, such as whether they are required etc (although
required inputs are a build-time only construct right now- but this is a
good illustration of why input flags can be useful). An alternative
could have been to have an additional boolean entry for signal inputs,
but allocating a number with more flexible input flags seems more future
proof and more reasonable andreadable.
More information on the megamorphic access when updating an input
signal
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FpnFruviKb6BFTQfMAP2AMEqEB0FI7z-3mT_qm7lzX8/edit.
PR Close#53571
In #52931, Kristiyan fixed a TemplateDefinitionBuilder bug in which derived alias variables in for loops (`$even`, `$first`, etc) were referring to the wrong level of nested `@for` block. (These variables are unique because they become inlined expressions, and are not "real" context variables.) He fixed this by appending level information to the generated alias name.
Template Pipeline actually suffered from the same bug. We fix it in a very similar way -- in particular, whenever these derived context variables are used, we make them depend on versions of `$index` and `$count` that have been suffixed with the xref of the enclosing repeater.
I have added a few more pipeline goldens, because we are not quite as clever as TDB about only generating the duplicate suffixed index and count variables when inside nested loops. This is fine, since in the long run, we want to refactor it more fundamentally.
I have also added a TODO to fix this more rigorously. In particular, it would be nice if we had proper support for shadowed variables, as well as unlimited levels of variables depending on one another.
PR Close#53662
Template pipeline previously mangled CSS property names like
`--camelCase` when used in host style bindings. Note: It still *does*
mangle these names in static style attrs, both in host bindings and on
elements. This is clearly wrong, but is consistent with what TDB does
today.
PR Close#53665
Currently compiling input transform in local mode breaks, since compiler does static analysis for the transform function, and this cannot be done in local mode if the function is imported from another compilation unit. In this fix the static analysis is ditched in local mode.
PR Close#53645
It's possible for attributes to have a namespace, we need to handle this
possiblity for both attribute instructions and attributes extracted to
the consts array.
PR Close#53646
The way we were handling ICU placeholders was not compatible with using
interpolations on attributes of elements inside the ICU. This change
refactors the handling of ICU placeholders and unifies the way
expression and tag placeholders work inside ICUs.
The new approach modifies the ingest logic to add the placeholder on to
the TextOp rather than the TextInterpolationOp. This is because, in
ICUs, we may need multiple i18n expressions created from the
interpolation expressions to roll up into the same placeholder. ICUs
essentially do the interpolation at compile time, combining the static
strings with special placeholder strings that represent the expression
values.
PR Close#53643
Consider a case when an explicit `this` read is inside a template with a context that also provides the variable name being read:
```
<ng-template let-a>{{this.a}}</ng-template>
```
Clearly, `this.a` should refer to the class property `a`. However, in today's Angular, `this.a` will refer to `let-a` on the template context.
Amazingly, both TemplateDefinitionBuilder and the Typecheck block have the same bug, and are consistent with each other! This is because `ImplicitReceiver` extends `ThisReceiver` in the parser AST, which is an insane gotcha.
In this commit, I patch the template pipeline to emulate this behavior as well.
To actually fix this nastiness, we have to:
- Update `ingest.ts` in the Template Pipeline (see the corresponding comment)
- Check `type_check_block.ts` in the Typecheck block code (see the corresponding comment)
- Turn off legacy TemplateDefinitionBuilder
- Fix g3, and release in a major version
PR Close#53594
`ng-content` elements, and thus their corresponding projection instructions, can have many attributes on them. Some of these attributes may result in special behavior. For example, `ngProjectAs` and `i18n-foo` both result in special const collection, into the approprate BindingKind slot in the const array. Additionally, `i18n-foo` needs to recieve all the additional i18n attribute processing.
We solve this by subjecting `ng-content` attributes to all the same pipeline logic that applies to attributes on elements, and then allow the element const collection phase to collect them.
PR Close#53594
For regular templates, any listener will have its name const collected into the bindings section of the element consts.
In contrast, host bindings omit listener names from their hostAttrs. This is a strange and inconsistent behavior, so we hide it behind a compatiblity mode flag.
PR Close#53594
It's possible for the user to create a host attrbiute binding with a
name that makes it _look_ like a class binding `{['class.foo']: ''}`, we
were previously treating these as actual class property bindings. This
change fixes the logic so that only true property bindings cam be
converted to class property bindings.
Note: A user who added an attribute like the above almost certainly
intended to create an actual class property binding. It would be nice if
we could add a diagnostic to warn them about this.
PR Close#53626
Further refine the template pipeline's behavior w.r.t. duplicate values
in the consts array to better align its behavior with TDB. In particular
this means allowing duplicate values for classes and styles.
PR Close#53596
Adds a test for handling of duplicate bindings. Fow now we replicate the
TDB behavior in template pipeline, which is: For style and class text
attributes, only keep the last one. For all other text attributes, add
all of the values to the consts array.
PR Close#53596
The for loop tracking function doesn't allow references to local template variables, aside from `$index` and the item which are passed in as parameters. We enforce this by rewriting all variable references to the components scope.
The problem is that the logic that rewrites the references first walks the view tree and then checks if the variable is `$index` or the item. This is problematic in nested for loops, because it'll find the `$index` of the parent.
These changes resolve the issue by checking for `$index` and the item first.
Fixes#53600.
PR Close#53604
Changes template pipeline to be less aggressive in const collecting
attrs, to match the behavior of template definition builder. There is
nothing wrong with the more aggressive const collection, and in fact it
would be good to re-enable it later, but for now this makes it easier to
transition from TDB to template pipeline.
Also adds a test to verify that sensitive iframe attributes are properly
validated.
PR Close#53580
TemplateDefinitionBuilder is apparently more careful about when it attempts to split namespaces in attribute values. However, we are doing this on style attributes, which might start with a single `:`. Rather than refactor our logic to only try to split namespaces in some cases, we can just add an option to make namespace splitting fail gracefully. We only use this option for attributes, not elements.
Note also: the compiled code for this, while "correct" is absolutely insane. Maybe we should consider fixing this, as a matter of principle.
PR Close#53574
Some elements may have multiple bindings with the same name. We should accept and emit them all, as long as they have different kinds.
Co-authored-by: Miles Malerba <mmalerba@users.noreply.github.com>
PR Close#53574
The template pipeline was previously not reserving a variable slot for the result of the `deferWhen` instruction, which caused the `defer when` feature to crash at runtime.
PR Close#53574
When an element is self-closing, it will cause an `element` instruction to be emitted (instead of `elementStart`/`elementEnd`). In that case, we should use map whole source span for the instruction, not just the starting span.
PR Close#53574
The template pipeline was producing slightly different names than TemplateDefinitionBuilder for defer deps functions. I have added a workaround in the name of backwards compatibility, to avoid suffixing the const pool function names.
PR Close#53574
Previously when we found an ICU that was the only translatable content
in its i18n block, we assigned the block's i18n context to the ICU.
However, we neglected to set the contextKind to inidcate that the
context was associated with an ICU. As of this change we now set the
correct contextKind.
This change also refactors the context creation to explicitly separate
creation of contexts for attributes, root i18n blocks, child i18n
blocks, and ICUs. This allows us to more easily ensure that contexts are
shared appropriately between i18n blocks and ICUs.
Finally, this change also refactors the i18n message extraction pahse to
simplify how contexts are converted to i18n messages. This
simplification should make it easier to merge i18n contexts and i18n
messages into a single op in a future refactor.
PR Close#53557
Whenever an input of a directive changes, the semantic symbol should
reflect this change for the type check API. This is important because
signal inputs require special output in the type checking blocks- hence
we need to ensure that such type checking blocks are re-generated
properly.
Test verify that incremental type-checking builds work as expected now.
PR Close#53521
Whenever a signal input is captured in a type check block, we will
insert an import. This will change the import graph so that the full
TypeScript program cannot be structurally re-used.
We can fix this trivially by ensuring the import graph remains stable,
by always generating an import to e.g. `@angular/core`. This fixes the
issue nicely for type-check block files. A test verifies this.
For inline code, such as TCB inline or the type constructors inline,
this fix is not applicable because we would change user-input source files,
adding new edges that would not exist for subsequent builds- causing the
program to be not re-used completely. One idea was to rely on the
existing edge that can be assumed to exist for directive code files.
This is true technically, but in practice TS does not deduplicate
imports- so our new namespace import when referencing our symbols will
invalidate the re-use. We will address this in a follow-up. There are a
couple of options, such as working with the TS team, updating the
existing edge, or inlining our helpers as well.
PR Close#53521
`o.WrappedNodeExpr` can show up in some cases, when a host binding's value is inside a TS expression.
It's an open question whether we will need to support all of the TS expression types as a result.
PR Close#53478
For some reason, the parser reuses the same field to store the animation phase and the event target. We were incorrectly interpreting the presence of any value on that field as an animation phase, leading us to incorrectly emit synthetic listener instructions for listeners on events with targets. This bug is now fixes.
PR Close#53478
`$any` should be interpreted as a cast, not as a context read of a variable called `$any`. This already worked in template compilations, but the relevant phase was not enabled for host bindings.
PR Close#53478
Fixes that the compiler was throwing an error if an ambient type is used inside of an input `transform` function. The problem was that the reference emitter was trying to write a reference to the ambient type's source file which isn't necessary.
Fixes#51424.
PR Close#51474
Adds support for sanitizing host bindings. Since the tag name of the
element the host binding is being set on isn't always known, we have to
consider multiple possible security contexts.
This commit also adds additional tests to help verify correct behavior
of the sanitization logic for different edge cases.
PR Close#53513
Use the DomElementSchemaRegistry to determine the correct security
context for static attributes, and pass it along during ingestion. Then
during the resolve sanitizers phase, use the security context to
determine if a trusted value function is needed
PR Close#53473
Consider the case:
```
<button *ngIf="true" [@anim]="field"></button>
```
Only the inner `button` should recieve a `property` instruction for the animation binding. We were previously emitting one for the implicit `ng-template` as well, and collecting it into the consts for the `ng-template`. Both of these issues are now fixed.
PR Close#53457
The behavior of explicit bindings on `ng-template`s was untested, and we differed from `TemplateDefinitionBuilder` significantly. We now have much more similar behavior, although not 100% identical.
For example, consider this templarte:
```
<ng-template l="l1" [p]="p1" [attr.a]="a1" [class.c]="c1"></ng-template>
```
It's not clear what a class binding on an `ng-template` would actually do. Nonetheless, it's well-defined behavior in TemplateDefinitionBuilder, which emits `property` instructions for all three bindings, and people actually do this in google3.
Note that some of these bindings don't really make much sense, but we have to support them for compatibility purposes.
See comments for an in-depth explanation of all the logic.
Also, add a test to exercise the problematic case.
PR Close#53457
The Template Pipeline has had a number of tricky bugs involving bindings on structural elements.
Consider this template:
```
<div *ngIf="true" [class.bar]="field"></div>
```
We were incorrectly emitting `ɵɵclassProp` on *both* the template's view, and the inner view. The solution is to just emit an extracted attribute on the enclosing template, so it still shows up in the const array, but does not affect the update block.
We will refactor binding ingestion soon, but this commit improves our correctness before any big refactor.
PR Close#53457
These patches are no longer necessary with the current state of the
type packages and the code within the repository. The types are now
included in the already required babel.d.ts file for the relevant
babel packages (currently: `@babel/core` and `@babel/generator`).
PR Close#53441
@for does not use actual TemplateOps, but instead has a similar
RepeaterCreateOp. This commit adds support for this op to the relevant
i18n phases.
PR Close#53440
This test actually passes, template pipeline just orders the translated
messages and consts array differently. Since the order isn't important,
we just fork off an alternate golden file for template pipeline.
PR Close#53459
