Reports a diagnostic if an NgModule refers to itself in its `imports` or `exports`. Previously the compiler would go into an infinite loop.
Fixes#58224.
PR Close#58231
Prior to this commit, each abstract method that was overloaded was extracted. With this commit it will be extracted only once. Every overload was and still will be supported by the signatures.
fixes#57693
PR Close#57707
Currently we don't defer any symbols that have references outside of the `import` statement and the `imports` array. This is a bit too aggressive, because it's possible that the symbol is only used for types (e.g. `viewChild<SomeCmp>('ref')`) which will be stripped when emitting to JS.
These changes expand the logic so that references inside type nodes aren't considered.
**Note:** one special case is when the symbol used in constructor-based DI (e.g. `constructor(someCmp: SomeCmp)`, because these constructors will be compiled to `directiveInject` calls. We don't need to worry about them, because the compiler introduces an addition `import * as i1 from './some-cmp';` import that it uses to refer to the symbol.
Fixes#55991.
PR Close#58104
This commit changes the structure of the API extraction files to include all symbols used inside a package.
The structure is a `Map`, Symbol => package
eg: 'ApplicationRef' => '@angular/core'
PR Close#57346
in order for the docs to process function entry, this commit refactor function extraction by keeping the implementation as a the default entry and adds all the overloads into a separate array of entries.
PR Close#56489
Currently we use some short variable names like `t` and `r` in the generated factory functions. They can conflict with local symbols with the same names, if they're used for DI.
These changes rename the parameters to reduce the change for conflicts.
Fixes#57168.
PR Close#57181
This commit is similar to 98ed5b609e, and
makes use of the preparation work implemented there.
Similar to directives and components marked via `jit: true`, we also
need to do the same for JIT marked `@NgModule` classes. This is mostly
important for downleveling of decorators to support dependency injection
of such classes.
Inside Google3, migrating from `ts_library` to `ng_module` turns of
decorator downleveling, so the `jit: true` for NgModule's is implicitly
requesting/reliant on this transform— as expected.
PR Close#57212
Currently we use some short variable names like `t` and `r` in the generated factory functions. They can conflict with local symbols with the same names, if they're used for DI.
These changes add a `ɵ` to the generated variables to reduce the chance of conflicts.
Fixes#57168.
PR Close#57181
Adds a new extended diagnostic that will flag `@let` declarations that aren't used within the template. The diagnostic can be turned off through the `extendedDiagnostics` compiler option.
PR Close#57033
Some Angular template instructions that follow each other may be chained
together in a single expressions statement, containing a deeply nested
AST of call expressions. The number of chained instructions wasn't previously
limited, so this could result in very deep ASTs that cause stack overflow
errors during TypeScript emit.
This commit introduces a limit to the number of chained instructions to
avoid these problems.
Closes#57066
PR Close#57069
Adds a new extended diagnostic that will flag `@let` declarations that aren't used within the template. The diagnostic can be turned off through the `extendedDiagnostics` compiler option.
PR Close#57033
This commit moves the JIT transforms into the ngtsc folder. They existed
outside of ngtsc mostly as an historic artifact— and now with compiler
relying on them even more deeply, it makes sense to move them into
`ngtsc/transform`.
PR Close#56892
Currently when compiling code with the Angular compiler, all classes
with Angular decorators are compiled with AOT. This includes type
checking, scope collection etc.
This may not be desirable for all components, e.g. dynamic components,
or test components w/ `TestBed.configureTestingModule` (if compiled with ngtsc).
Those components can opt out of AOT on a per component-basis via `jit:
true`. This is helpful as it allows incremental migrations/refactorings
to AOT. Whether we want to keep this capability long-term is something
to be discussed separately.
For now though, we should fix that components compiled with `jit: true`
actually work as expected. Currently this **not the case** as soon as
the new initializer APIs are used— as those do no longer declare class
metadata with decorators.
This commit runs the JIT transform on JIT-opted classes.
Related: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ox4atCJldWWDXlaYgwM-hU8BNsTpKNW7gx8OfZ0HtRY/edit?resourcekey=0-G1haTNYtD-dN0vNRkQ8_OQ&tab=t.0
PR Close#56892
When we process `@if` and `@for` blocks, we create a scope around their expressions in order to encapsulate the aliases to them. The problem is that this doesn't represent the actual structure since the expression is part of the outer scope. This surfaces by not raising the "used before declared" diagnostic for `@let` declarations.
These changes resolve the issue by processing the expression as a part of the parent scope.
Fixes#56842.
PR Close#56843
Currently the logic that maps a name to a variable looks at the variables in their definition order. This means that `@let` declarations from parent views will always come before local ones, because the local ones are declared inline whereas the parent ones are hoisted to the top of the function.
These changes resolve the issue by giving precedence to the local variables.
Fixes#56737.
PR Close#56752
When running the JIT transforms in 1P w/ tsickle, tsickle will
transform source files before our custom transforms can run. This is
also impacting the Ivy transform and hence we use `ts.getOriginalNode`
in various places to inspect the source AST for detecting Angular.
For the JIT transform we need to do a similar change so that the
transform could run in 1P.
PR Close#56520
Enables the new `@let` syntax by default.
`@let` declarations are defined as:
1. The `@let` keyword.
2. Followed by one or more whitespaces.
3. Followed by a valid JavaScript name and zero or more whitespaces.
4. Followed by the `=` symbol and zero or more whitespaces.
5. Followed by an Angular expression which can be multi-line.
6. Terminated by the `;` symbol.
Example usage:
```
@let user = user$ | async;
@let greeting = user ? 'Hello, ' + user.name : 'Loading';
<h1>{{greeting}}</h1>
```
Fixes#15280.
PR Close#56715
These changes integrate let declarations into the template pipeline. This involves a few operations:
* Producing a `declareLet` instruction call at creation time to initialize the declaration.
* Producing a `storeLet` instruction call in the place of the let declaration, including the necessary `advance` calls beforehand.
* For let declarations used within their declaration view, moving the `const` to be placed right after the `storeLet` call to ensure the their value has been computed.
* For let declarations that are _only_ used in their declaration view, removing the `storeLet` call and inlining the expression into the constant statement.
PR Close#56299
Updates the check that prevent writes to template variables in two-way bindings to account for let declarations.
Also fixes some old tests that weren't properly setting up two-way bindings.
PR Close#56199
Integrates let declarations into the template type checker by producing corresponding constants in the TCB.
This also includes a couple of custom diagnostics to flag usages of let before they're declared and illegal writes to let declarations. We can't rely on TS for these checks, because it includes the variable name in the diagnostic.
PR Close#56199
Currently the template syntax errors are extracted in the template type check phase. But in local compilation mode we skip the type check phase. As a result template syntax errors are not displayed. With this change we show the template syntax diagnostics in local mode.
PR Close#55855
Currently we optimize methods that pass both `$index` and the item into a method. We can take this a step further by also optimizing calls that only pass `$index` into the first parameter.
PR Close#55872
When an `@if` expression has an alias, only the type of the alias is
currently narrowed. So for example, suppose `value` is `string|undefined`:
```
@if (value; as alias) {
{{ value.length }} <!-- error, value may be undefined -->
{{ alias.length }} <!-- no error, alias is narrowed -->
}
```
This is especially noticeable when the expression contains guards which are
preconditions for the aliased expression:
```
@if (a && b; as alias) {...}
```
In this case, `a` would not be narrowed within the body, even though the
`@if` condition forces it to be truthy. This is a bug.
The reason is that aliased expressions were previously type-checked as:
```
var alias = a && b;
if (alias) {
// nothing other than alias is narrowed
...
}
```
One option considered was to emit `const alias` instead of `var alias`.
TypeScript _does_ trace `const` expressions and narrow their individual
components when the overall expression is guarded:
```
const alias = a && b;
if (alias) {
// a, b are also narrowed
}
```
However, this narrowing has different semantics than if `a && b` appeared
directly in the guard expression. For example, object properties aren't
narrowed with this approach, so component properties (which are referenced
as e.g. `this.a`) would not be narrowed.
Instead, we amend the guard expression to include both the expression _and_ the
alias variable, enforcing that both are narrowed.
```
var alias = a && b;
if ((a && b) && alias) {
// a, b, and alias all narrowed correctly.
}
```
This form ensures all conditions within the guard expression get narrowed
while also narrowing the alias variable type.
Fixes#52855
PR Close#55835
Since we aren't using clang anymore, we can remove the comments and the workarounds that were in place to prevent it from doing the wrong thing.
PR Close#55750
Fixes that we didn't have the MathML elements in the schema. Note that we can't discover which tag names are available by looking at globally-available classes, because all MathML elements are `MathMLElement` rather than something like `SVGCircleElement`. As such, I ended up having to hardcode the currently-available tags.
Fixes#55608.
PR Close#55631
Currently we add global extra imports to all the files in the compilation unit. However not all the files need extra imports. For example non-Angular files definitely do not need such extra imports, and in some cases these extra imports causes problems as the file is meant to be run the Node but it has Angular dependencies which are not compatible with Node. This change tries to limit extra import generation to a subset of files. Wit hthis change we create extra imports only for the files that contain at least one component whose NgModule is in a different file. This is because all other files do not need extra imports since they are either not Angular files or they already have all the imports that the components need.
PR Close#55548
Currently whenever a compliance test case TS file is modified, all
compliance tests in repository are rebuilt in partial compilation mode.
This is inefficient and also slows down local development where one may
use a wildcard to run all test targets inside `/test/compliance/...`.
This commit fixes this.
PR Close#55594
Two-way bindings are meant to represent a property binding to an input and an event binding to an output, e.g. `[(ngModel)]="foo"` represents `[ngModel]="foo" (ngModelChange)="foo = $event"`. Previously due to a quirk in the template parser, we accidentally supported unassignable expressions in two-way bindings.
In #54154 the quirk was fixed, but we kept support or some common expression because of internal usages. Now the internal usages have been cleaned up so the backwards-compatibility code can be deleted.
Externally a migration was added in #54630 that will automatically fix any places that depended on the old behavior.
BREAKING CHANGE:
Angular only supports writable expressions inside of two-way bindings.
PR Close#55342
Previously the input flags were being generated as a reference to an enum member for better readability and under the assumption that minifiers would inline the values. That doesn't appear to be the case so these changes switch to using the literal values instead.
PR Close#55215
In #52110 we had to use `if` statements to represent `switch` blocks, because TypeScript had a bug when narrowing the type of parenthesized `switch` statements. Now that it has been fixed by TypeScript and we don't support any version that has the broken behavior, we can go back to generating `switch` statements in the TCB which are simpler and better represent the user's code.
PR Close#55168
