Supports binding `null` to a `<input type=number>`.
- Binding in `null` clears the input
- Binding in `NaN` also clears the input
- When the user clears the input, the model is set to `null`
- The model is _never_ set to `NaN` based on user interaction. It is
either set to `null` if the user cleared the input, or is unchanged
and a parse error added if the user entered an invalid number like
"42e"
PR Close#66917
The `isTypeOnly` property was deprecated in TypeScript and replaced by `phaseModifier`.
Updates the check to use `phaseModifier`, which is the recommended API for detecting type-only imports.
Additionally, removes the unused `metadata` parameter from the `NgModuleExtractor`
`FieldTree` was an unnecessarily specific type for the `[formField]`
input. It forced the directive to care about what _kind_ of `FieldTree`
was bound–specifically whether it was Reactive Forms compatible or not.
This made it difficult to author forms system-agnostic components with
passthrough `[formField]` inputs.
Based on the discussion in #66294: now that we support arrow functions in event listeners, developers may write out something like `(click)="() => expr"` which will be a no-op. These changes update the existing diagnostic for uninvoked expressions in listeners to account for it.
Refactors the `ɵɵcontrolCreate` and `ɵɵcontrol` instructions to delegate control logic to the forms package via new `ɵngControlCreate` and `ɵngControlUpdate` lifecycle hooks. Previously, the logic for binding form state to native elements and custom controls was hardcoded within `@angular/core`.
**Compiler Changes:**
- Introduces a new compilation phase `specializeControlProperties` (in `control_directives.ts`).
- This phase detects properties named `formField` and specializes them into `ControlCreate` and `Control` IR opcodes.
- These opcodes emit `ɵɵcontrolCreate` and `ɵɵcontrol` instructions, respectively.
**Runtime Changes:**
- `ɵɵcontrolCreate` acts as the creation phase. It locates the control directive and invokes its `ɵngControlCreate` method.
- `ɵɵcontrol` acts as the update phase, and invokes the control directive's `ɵngControlUpdate` method (if present).
- Introduces a `passThroughInput` configuration in `ControlFeature`. This specifies the input name (e.g., `formField`) that triggers the control. If the runtime detects that this input is bound to multiple targets (e.g., the `FormField` directive *and* the host component), the control is flagged as "pass-through". In this state, `ɵngControlCreate` returns a no-op update function, deferring responsibility to the other consumer (e.g., the component managing the field itself).
**Forms Changes:**
- `FormField` directive implements `ɵngControlCreate` and `ɵngControlUpdate`.
- Inside this hook, `FormField` determines the type of control it is attached to (Native, CVA, or Custom Signal Control) and delegates to the appropriate handler (`nativeControlCreate`, `cvaControlCreate`, or `customControlCreate`).
- Consolidates all form binding logic within `@angular/forms/signals`, enabling support for new `FormValueControl` and `FormCheckboxControl` interfaces.
- Reorganizes the codebase by moving `FormField` from `api/` to `directive/` and splitting the binding logic into semantic pieces:
- `control_native.ts`, `control_cva.ts`, and `control_custom.ts` contain the specific handlers for each control type.
- `native.ts` and `select.ts` provide helpers for native element discovery and select-specific synchronization.
- `bindings.ts` manages the tracking and application of property/attribute bindings.
When synthesizing an import corresponding with a .tsx file, the extension
would not be removed unlike regular .ts files. Adjust the import generators
to also drop any .tsx extension from module specifiers.
Closes#66262
When producing a listener, the template pipeline does the following in separate phases:
1. Generates all the variables available within its scope.
2. Adds `restoreView` and `resetView` calls if there are any referenced to local variables (e.g. `@let` or local refs).
3. Optimizes away the variables that aren't used.
This means that we can end up in a situation where the references to the variables in the scope no longer exist, but we still enter and leave the view as if they're there which is unnecessary.
These changes add a simple optimization pass that looks specifically for the pattern of a `restoreView` followed by a `return resetView(expr)`. Furthermore, by changing the order of some optimizations, we're able to drop the `getCurrentView` variable as well.
Fixes#66286.
```ts
@Component(...)
class Outer {
constructor() {
@Component(...)
class Inner {}
}
}
```
previous behavior was that IVy transformation was only applied to `Inner`, thus breaking `Outer` transformation.
Prior to this change, binding to radio value was sensitive to the order in which `value` & `formField` where binding in the template.
The compiler change makes that order non-important.
fixes#66402
Error message links now point to the archived documentation site (v*.angular.dev)
so that referenced content matches the framework version in use.
See angular#44650
PR Close#66374
This completes the rename started in #66136. `[field]` is too generic of
a selector for the forms system to own, and likely to cause naming
collisions with existing components. Therefore it is being renamed to
`[formField]`
Reworks how we store arrow functions in the following ways:
1. Rather than the `storeCallback` and `getCallback` instructions, we generate a single `arrowFunction` instruction.
2. The `arrowFunction` instruction uses a factory to create a new instance of the function when a function is read for the first time.
3. We now keep arrow functions in listeners in line so that they have access to `$event`.
Adds support for using arrow functions in Angular expressions. They generally behave like JS arrow functions with the same access as other Angular expressions, but with the following limitations:
* We only support arrow functions with implicit returns, e.g. `(a) => a + 1` is allowed while `(a) => { return a + 1 }` is not.
* Pipes can't be used inside arrow functions, but they can be passed through to pipes.
To avoid recreating the functions in each change detection, the compiler applies a couple of optimizations:
* If an arrow function only references its own parameters, it is extracted into a top-level constant that is passed around to the different usage sites.
* If an arrow function has references to the template context, we store it on the current view and read the stored value later on.
Fixes#14129.
Updates the template type checker to support arrow functions. The main challenge was getting the current infrastructure not to rewrite references to arrow function parameters.
Previously, object literal keys in the TCB did not have source spans attached. This made it difficult for the Language Service to distinguish between keys and values, leading to incorrect completion contexts and diagnostic locations.
This commit ensures that source spans are properly attached to the keys in the TCB.
This will replace the `[field]` directive, since `[field]` is a very
generic name for signal forms to commandeer
refactor(forms): hook up `formField` directive in compiler
Hooks up the `formField` direcive to get the same treatment as the
`field` directive in the compiler.
apply updated formatting
This commit updates the DOM security schema and sanitization logic to properly recognize and sanitize `href` and `xlink:href` attributes on SVG `<script>` elements.
Since the `Field` directive manages binding `FieldState` properties to
the underlying form control automatically, the type checker prohibits
explicit bindings to the same properties to avoid conflicts. This proved
problematic in cases where developers wanted to bind these properties to
the inputs of other directives on form controls. Now the framework will
bind the field state properties to all matching directive inputs on
native controls.
Fix#65617
Sets up the compliance tests to target es2022 since that's the default in the CLI. Also updates all of the tests, primarily because the generated output for static properties has changed.
Back in #39323, I added a new `ThisReceiver` node to represent accesses done through `this` and I ended up making it inherit from `ImplicitReceiver`. The logic was that in most cases accessing through `this` was the same as the implicit access.
Over the years this has proven to not be a great idea, because no other AST nodes do this and one has to keep it in mind whenever dealing with `ImplicitReceiver`.
These changes remove the inheritance and update all of the usage sites accordingly.
