Since those are top level APIs, `ngDevMode` might not be available at runtime if they're invoked before the variable is set.
fixes#62796
PR Close#63875
Previously, using `Validators.required`, `Validators.minLength` and `Validators.maxLength` validators don't work with sets because a set has the `size` property instead of the `length` property. This change enables the validators to be working with sets.
PR Close#45793
We enabled a lint rule internally to require that multi-provided
`InjectionToken`s have a `readonly` array type, the tokens in this
PR do not follow this rule and are causing lint violations.
Fixes#51124
PR Close#51125
The private util `isObservable` was actually just testing the same thing as`isSubscribable()`. As the implementation is closer to the function's name, let's only keep ``isSubscribable`.
PR Close#49295
Replace `new Error()` in a forms Validators function with `RuntimeError`, for better tree-shakability. Also, improve the error messages, and add documentation.
PR Close#46537
in the validators documentation, the value for the formControl for both required and requiredTrue validators is an empty string. This is OK for required since it gives us an error. But I think if we set the value of formControl responsible for requiredTrue to something other than an empty string (e.g.: 'some value'), it would demonstrate the difference between required and requiredTrue better.
PR Close#45533
in the validators documentation, the value for the formControl for both required and requiredTrue validators is an empty string. This is OK for required since it gives us an error. But I think if we set the value of formControl responsible for requiredTrue to something other than an empty string (e.g.: 'some value'), it would demonstrate the difference between required and requiredTrue better.
PR Close#45533
model.ts is currently extremely large. This is the first step in an attempt to refactor it to be more easily navigable and reviewable. This commit breaks up `model.ts` into the following new files:
* `model/abstract_model.ts`: The remainder of the model, including the `AbstractControl` base class and helper functions which are used throughout.
* `model/form_control.ts`: `FormControl`, `FormControlOptions`, and helpers, plus the constructor and untyped friends.
* `model/form_array.ts`: `FormArray` and untyped friends.
* `model/form_group.ts`: `FormGroup` and untyped friends.
This first phase is a purely mechanical code move. There is no new code at all, and no interfaces have been separated.
PR Close#45217
Form required validator should not reject objects that contain a length attribute set to zero.
Fixes#30718.
Co-authored-by: Dylan Hunn <dylhunn@gmail.com>
BREAKING CHANGE: objects with a length key set to zero will no longer validate as empty.
This is technically a breaking change, since objects with a key `length` and value `0` will no longer validate as empty. This is a very minor change, and any reliance on this behavior is probably a bug anyway.
PR Close#33729
Several new functionalities are possible with this change: the most requested is that callers can now check whether a control has a required validator. Other uses include incrementally changing the validators set without doing an expensive operation to reset all validators.
Closes#13461.
PR Close#42838
Currently the `Validators` class contains a number of static methods that represent different validators as well as some helper methods. Since class methods are not tree-shakable, any reference to the `Validator` class retains all of its methods (even if you've used just one).
This commit refactors the code to extract the logic into standalone functions and use these functions in the code instead of referencing them via `Validators` class. That should make the code more tree-shakable. The `Validators` class still retains its structure and calls these standalone methods internally to keep this change backwards-compatible.
PR Close#41189
Prior to this commit, the `cleanUpControl` function (responsible for cleaning up control instance)
was not taking validators into account. As a result, these validators remain registered on a detached
form control instance, thus causing memory leaks. This commit updates the `cleanUpControl` function
logic to also run validators cleanup.
As a part of this change, the logic to setup and cleanup validators was refactored and moved to
separate functions (with completely opposite behavior), so that they can be reused in the future.
This commit doesn't add the `cleanUpControl` calls to all possible places, it just fixes the cases
where this function is being called, but doesn't fully perform a cleanup. The `cleanUpControl`
function calls will be added to other parts of code (to avoid more memory leaks) in a followup PR.
PR Close#39234
This commit refactors validators-related logic that is common across most of the directives.
A couple notes on this refactoring:
* common logic was moved to the `AbstractControlDirective` class (including `validator` and
`asyncValidator` getters)
* sync/async validators are now composed in `AbstractControlDirective` class eagerly when validators
are set with `_setValidators` and `_setAsyncValidators` calls and the result is stored in directive
instance (thus getters return cached versions of validator fn). This is needed to make sure composed
validator function remains the same (retains its identity) for a given directive instance, so that
this function can be added and later removed from an instance of an AbstractControl-based class
(like `FormControl`). Preserving validator function is required to perform proper cleanup (in followup
PRs) of the AbstractControl-based classes when a directive is destroyed.
PR Close#38280
Due to how the global and sticky flag make RegExp objects stateful,
adds section detailing how it is not recommended
to use these flags for control validations.
PR Close#39055
This commit adds a guard before throwing any forms errors. This will tree-shake
error messages which cannot be minified. It should also help to reduce the
bundle size of the `forms` package in production by ~20%.
Closes#37697
PR Close#37821
This commit performs minor refactoring in Forms package to get rid of duplicate functions.
It looks like the functions were duplicated due to a slightly different type signatures, but
their logic is completely identical. The logic in retained functions remains the same and now
these function also accept a generic type to achieve the same level of type safety.
PR Close#38371
Previously, the behavior of the `minLength` and `maxLength` validators
caused confusion, as they appeared to work with numeric values but
did not in fact produce consistent results. This commit fixes the issue
by skipping validation altogether when a numeric value is used.
BREAKING CHANGES:
* The `minLength` and `maxLength` validators now verify that a value has
numeric `length` property and invoke validation only if that's the case.
Previously, falsey values without the length property (such as `0` or
`false` values) were triggering validation errors. If your code relies on
the old behavior, you can include other validators such as [min][1] or
[requiredTrue][2] to the list of validators for a particular field.
[1]: https://angular.io/api/forms/Validators#min
[2]: https://angular.io/api/forms/Validators#requiredTrueCloses#35591
PR Close#36157
Previously, it was not clear that the `minLength` and `maxLength` validators
can only be used with objects that contain a `length` property. This commit
clarifies this.
PR Close#36297
There is currently a bug in Chrome 80 that makes Array.reduce
not work according to spec. The functionality in forms that
retrieves controls from FormGroups and FormArrays (`form.get`)
relied on Array.reduce, so the Chrome bug broke forms for
many users.
This commit refactors our forms code to rely on Array.forEach
instead of Array.reduce to fix forms while we are waiting
for the Chrome fix to go live.
See https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1049982.
PR Close#35349
As mentioned in the previous commit, the regexp used by
`Validators.email()` is a slightly enhanced version of the
[WHATWG one](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/input.html#valid-e-mail-address).
This commit refactors the regexp (without changing its behavior) to make
it more closely match the format of WHATWG version, so that it is easier
for people to compare it against the WHATWG one and understand the
differences.
The main changes were:
- Changing the order of characters/character classes inside `[...]`;
e.g. `[A-Za-z]` --> `[a-zA-Z]`
- Mark all groups as non-capturing (since we do not use the captured
values); e.g. `(foo)` --> `(?:foo)`
(This could theoretically also have a positive performance impact, but
I suspect JavaScript engines are already optimizing away capturing
groups when they are not used.)
PR Close#32961
Previously, there was no documentation of what `Validators.email()`
expects as a valid e-mail address, making it difficult for people to
determine whether it covers their requirements or not. Even more so that
the used pattern slightly deviates from the
[WHATWG version](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/input.html#valid-e-mail-address).
One's only option was to look at the source code and try to decipher the
regexp pattern.
This commit adds a high-level description of the validator and mentions
its similarity to and differences from the WHATWG version. It also adds
a brief explanation of the regexp's behavior and references for more
information in the source code to provide more context to
maintainers/users trying to understand the implementation in the future.
Fixes#18985Fixes#25186Closes#32747
PR Close#32961
